Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
454/425hp mercruiser >

454/425hp mercruiser

Notices

454/425hp mercruiser

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-09-2025 | 10:48 AM
  #11  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,023
Likes: 1,522
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

I installed 500 EFI cams in my Merc Gen V 454's a few years ago. I don't regret it. Didn't gain much performance, but the roller piece of mind was worth it.

Rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-2025 | 11:48 AM
  #12  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,272
Likes: 2,513
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

Originally Posted by TomZ
There is always an advantage to going with a roller lifter over a flat tappet.

Originally, the idea was that there would be more power for the given lift and duration compared to a flat tappet, but these days, the primary advantage is around keeping the engine together.

The cam that Griff referenced is close copy of the Crane 168731 used in the Merc HP500 502. The 168731 cam did have some issues with reversion so if you go that way, make sure your exhaust is up to the task.
The 168731 cam is close a 500efi cam and they didn't have any reversion issues. The HP500 carb engine cams were different and they had reversion issues at idle.
Originally Posted by Baja370
So I would have no advantage in installing roller lifter?
The 168731 is a roller cam
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-2025 | 12:50 PM
  #13  
TomZ's Avatar
Platinum Member
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 1,459
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
The 168731 cam is close a 500efi cam and they didn't have any reversion issues. The HP500 carb engine cams were different and they had reversion issues at idle.

The 168731 is a roller cam
I thought the 731-ish cam that Merc used caused some reversion issues. Maybe I got that one a little wrong?

Had to dig around for the HP 500 specs... courtesy of RMBuilder a way's back:

284*/292* @ .004"
222*/230* @ .050"
.576"/.598" valve
110* LSA
105* ICL
115* ECL

That 110* LSA probably didn't help much with the Gils that they originally came with.


Last edited by TomZ; 01-09-2025 at 02:00 PM.
TomZ is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-2025 | 12:57 PM
  #14  
TomZ's Avatar
Platinum Member
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,303
Likes: 1,459
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Originally Posted by Rookie
I installed 500 EFI cams in my Merc Gen V 454's a few years ago. I don't regret it. Didn't gain much performance, but the roller piece of mind was worth it.
Have the 169621 500 EFI cams in the Bullet - 060 and 080 over 454s with B&M 250s. 188 heads, nothing special just super reliable and really strong. They really like the 500 EFI cams. Anyway, supercharging isn't the subject here.
TomZ is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-2025 | 11:48 PM
  #15  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,272
Likes: 2,513
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

Originally Posted by TomZ
I thought the 731-ish cam that Merc used caused some reversion issues. Maybe I got that one a little wrong?

Had to dig around for the HP 500 specs... courtesy of RMBuilder a way's back:

284*/292* @ .004"
222*/230* @ .050"
.576"/.598" valve
110* LSA
105* ICL
115* ECL

That 110* LSA probably didn't help much with the Gils that they originally came with.
Yeah and Merc actually changed the Gil tailpipes from this style to the ones that are taller and have more swoop

Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-2025 | 08:02 AM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

Have same exhaust Rookie Pic engine but not same intake ,
Baja370 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-2025 | 08:03 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default

Mine is more elevate
Baja370 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2025 | 02:42 AM
  #18  
KAAMA's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 107
From: Western Michigan
Default

I agree with installing new hydraulic roller cam and lifters as Griff has suggested, but just make sure that those Gill Marine exhaust manifolds and tailpipes are a completely dry system especially with that cam being on a 110 or a 112 LSA otherwise you're going to have reversion problems.
If you have a "wet" exhaust system, then you most likely will need a lobe separation angle (LSA) of 114° within the cam specs of the camshaft so as not to revert or have reversion of water back up into the engine.

Also I would stick with the Air-Gap dual plane intake manifolds that you said you already have... They will give you better lower and midrange performance on those 454's especially with a heavier boat like the 37 ft Baja that you have. They would provide great throttle response and work great for your application.
You could even add a phenolic 1" OPEN carburetor spacer to keep the carburetor from getting heat soaked.
and for a hair more performance.
Just my .02 but I think you're on the right track with the advice given by the others.
KAAMA is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2025 | 03:29 PM
  #19  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,272
Likes: 2,513
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

A 168731 won't have reversion issues with full length wet exhaust tails like the ones in the pic on my 525SC. The water mixed into the exhaust about 2" before the rubber hose connection to the exhaust tips.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 04-02-2025 | 09:34 AM
  #20  
KAAMA's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 107
From: Western Michigan
Default

Griff, would you happen to know/recall what RPM the 500 HP peeked out at with that 731 cam in it?
Thanks
KAAMA is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.