Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   540 tall deck or standard? (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/79297-540-tall-deck-standard.html)

Andy Buzz 05-17-2004 08:11 PM

540 tall deck or standard?
 
Decided on a 540 as the size of motor. Now the quesion is should the deck be standard or tall. The goal is to have longest engine life and will be mainly used between 3500 and 4500 rpm. Engines are spaced 35 inches crank center with e-tops as exhaust.

I figure longer rod means faster wear but better piston angle. Which is better?

Infomaniac 05-17-2004 08:17 PM

Re: 540 tall deck or standard?
 

Originally Posted by Andy Buzz
Decided on a 540 as the size of motor. Now the quesion is should the deck be standard or tall. The goal is to have longest engine life and will be mainly used between 3500 and 4500 rpm. Engines are spaced 35 inches crank center with e-tops as exhaust.

I figure longer rod means faster wear but better piston angle. Which is better?

Tall deck 6.800 rod is my favorite combination.

Better rod angle = less wear on the pistons and cyl walls.

Cmoney 08-11-2004 09:10 PM

Re: 540 tall deck or standard?
 
ttt

mopower 08-11-2004 09:38 PM

Re: 540 tall deck or standard?
 
2 Attachment(s)
Keep in mind the tall deck block will put the two engines about a 1/2 inch closer to each other since the heads are higher and further out from the crank C/L. I used standard blocks and didn't realize the exhasst ports in the Merlin heads were higher. I did get lucky and the hatch lift JUST fit beween the manifolds

waterbum 08-11-2004 10:01 PM

Re: 540 tall deck or standard?
 
1 Attachment(s)
I went with Dart Big M tall decks to build my 540s. I also have 35 inch on center motors. With CMI elbow top headers, I have about 1 inch between exhausts. Used tall single plane manifolds and had barely enough clearance to close hatches with 3" K&N filters. Every builder I talked to said go with the tall deck if that was an option, so I did.

mcollinstn 08-11-2004 10:21 PM

Re: 540 tall deck or standard?
 
Long rods don't mean faster wear. There's less side load with longer rods.

The only drawback is that they take up more room. Taller block. Intake spacers. Less room between motors.

Cmoney 08-12-2004 06:23 AM

Re: 540 tall deck or standard?
 
I going to have a couple of 540's around 590 hp built this fall. My engine builder said it's my call on tall deck or standard about $1400 more. He said I really don't need the tall deck due to my mild setup.
What do you guys think, money is getting tight but I would hate to skimp at this point?
Thanks Alot

cstraub69@comcast 08-12-2004 08:54 AM

Re: 540 tall deck or standard?
 
If keeping the boat long term, go tall decks. If keeping the boat short term, go low decks.

Chris

z.zuperboat 08-12-2004 11:26 AM

Re: 540 tall deck or standard?
 
What About Building 572,s The Parts Are The Same Price I Believe.and They Would Make About 50hp More.i Built A Short Deck 540 With Gm Block And Heads And Makes 630.the Builder Said The Geometry Of The Tall Deck Is Better And A Tall Deck Block Is Stronger Then My Gm But For My Application And My Budget The Short Deck Was Fine.if Your Planning On Supercharging Later Go Tall Deck.

Cmoney 08-12-2004 12:26 PM

Re: 540 tall deck or standard?
 
I started out rebuiling my 454 mags and now I am talking about 540's I have to stop there.
I just don't like hearing "the standard blocks are not as durable" but they will be fine for you :crazy: . I am looking for long term, but was told the standard will be fine.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.