![]() |
Re: Turbine Dilemma
Sorry about that this forum thing is new to me,more used to getting thick of oil
Try again J |
Re: Turbine Dilemma
Nice!! :D Make sure you get us some more pics when you get it in the boat :D
|
Re: Turbine Dilemma
Sorry the engines I am useing are very hard to come by so I will not be selling, if you in the states the best idea is to souce some T53s
J |
Re: Turbine Dilemma
impressive set up :cool:
|
Re: Turbine Dilemma
very cool rig!
|
Re: Turbine Dilemma
That splitter box will have a tad of torque running thru it, and I would keep the lid closed in case it lets go...
Getting a single prop to bite to get on plane with a pitch descent enough for good top end might prove challenging pushing a Scarab and the fuel you need to turn that monster. The Gentry Eagle is setup with a monster single Arneson Drive behind an even more grotesque Turbine but it has twin diesel jet-drive to help get on plane and some serious weight and length to offset the torque. On a Kevlar Scarab 38 however even if you get on plane in a single drive configuration, taking into account the torque I would run tabs the size of Scotland behind it to feel safe. 1600hp is not a ton but your boat will be very lite compared to a classic boat, you won't have the big block's weight in the rear end weighting it down. Just expressing common sense in my eyes I am by far no expert. |
Re: Turbine Dilemma
Sweet set up! :D
|
Re: Turbine Dilemma
I think you will need to put some mounts on that splitter box to stop "flexing" and keep drive shaft alignment proper. What kind of reduction are you running?
Wannabe |
Re: Turbine Dilemma
That turbine only turns 6400 rpm at 100% ?
|
Re: Turbine Dilemma
Originally Posted by SK-190
That turbine only turns 6400 rpm at 100% ?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.