Ltr from Mark Nemschoff, Board Member APBA Offshore LLC
11-06-2003, 05:45 PM
#12
OSO Content Provider
Commercial Member
I think maybe we can see the light at the end of the tunnel.....
Best of luck to all of you......
Now BRING IT ON!!!!!
Best of luck to all of you......
Now BRING IT ON!!!!!
11-11-2003, 06:47 AM
#13
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: In the Mountains
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A very favorable impression. Thank you "Men in Charge". Let's all look forward to 04' as bigger, better, and FEWER PROBLEMS. I'm sure going to try to do my share at the "local level".
11-19-2003, 06:04 PM
#14
Charter Member #94
Charter Member
Originally posted by Peconic
What about the agreed-upon changes in F1/F2? What about one engine, one drive, one weight? Tabled, or go through with it?
We were at a 475hp engine, a Bravo drive (no Sportmaster requirement), 4650 lbs for all F1 boats.
My feeling (and there was consensus in the meetings) is that the HP500 as one engine for all would be a workable and least-cost alternative.
What about the agreed-upon changes in F1/F2? What about one engine, one drive, one weight? Tabled, or go through with it?
We were at a 475hp engine, a Bravo drive (no Sportmaster requirement), 4650 lbs for all F1 boats.
My feeling (and there was consensus in the meetings) is that the HP500 as one engine for all would be a workable and least-cost alternative.
Even though the racers would have been saving thousands of $$$, It sounds like a number of factory teams started complaining that the Offshore-LLC was only trying to make money off of the racers, so the whole thing got shot down
__________________
Abby-someone
Abby-someone
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ScottB
General Boating Discussion
14
07-16-2003 09:07 AM
