![]() |
Hey Ironman! Do you want to participate in this years Lake George Performance Weekend Offshore Demonstration? Last year we had 3 Pantera's. If so, shoot me a pm.
|
when is that? how many pantera boats you got coming so far this year?
|
what happens at an offshore demonstration? Name of a pokerrun or something.....
|
Originally Posted by tomcei
(Post 3622764)
LOL. You got me:silenced:
I was told by Imco that with all top speeds the same between the two ratio drives.( assume props were obviously changed to match equal top speed) that the 1:5 had a better "rolling torque". Basically the 1:5 would have slightly better acceleration. Not sure why they say "rolling" when we are talking boats. It also seems slightly puzzling when you think about the gears and prop ratios as just a math formula and why there would be a difference in acceleration. I know with cars the rear end gear and the tire size can be changed to achieve the same results. I guess the prop speed and hydro action make the difference in slip or something. weird.:bong: Any thoughts? I would also imagine part of the reason a 28 single with the average drive height will usually run faster on top end with a proper set up 4 blade than say a 5 or even 6 blade.. There's ofcourse always exceptions due to many variables such as the drive height, weight, & the amount of tourqe the particular rig makes.. I'll add that just having that little bit of extra tourqe multiplication availible to the prop with a 1.5 over a 1.32 at "say" 800 ft lbs. comes out to an additional 112 ft lbs. if my math is correct.. It would make a differance of 14 ft lbs for every 100 that the engine makes.. Even though the prop pitch would be lower running a 1.36 over a 1.5 (lower pitch obviously being easier to push) you are still attempting to push the same diameter prop, which may add to the equation as well.. That being said I'm not so sure I would listen to a dude who doesn't even have a running boat, however I have stayed at a Motel 6 before so ?? :stooges: |
I believe both you and Chris are correct. I have talked to many people about this in the past few days. Imco, my engine builder, etc. The consensus is the same. Imco flat out said the acceleration would be sightly less even if the top speeds were the same. My engine builder said I probably wouldn't tell a difference. Pantera said the same. This all came about when I saw the SCX 1:35 pop up for sale last week.
|
Either way dude, We both know your not exactly lacking in the torque category so you will be just fine with a 1.35... If you put a 1.5 on it you would probably be lighter on the stick through midrange anyways, and that brings all back to equal... ;)
If you were making 550 ft lbs. the story would be a bit different.. In other words quit holding out and post the pics.. haha !! All jokes aside you indeed have one of the coolest, classiest & cleanest 28's out there period, and I can't wait to here "she's wet againt" And tell your neighbor "too tall jones" I said: Hello |
Too funny......I'm getting closer.
The drive I was looking at sold in less than a day .dang-it :angry-smiley-038: |
Tom, how much $ would it have been to change it to a 1.5?
|
Originally Posted by Stormrider
(Post 3625865)
Tom, how much $ would it have been to change it to a 1.5?
Anyway I'm still looking. Missed a pretty good deal. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.