performance question
#11
Registered

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Covington, LA
Pedal Pusher hit the water last week for a short shake down cruise and another today. 900's per side will certainly get you past 100, 800's would do it also... Just got to figure out what you're going to connect that to. Bravos would seem like high maintenance. Six's would be an expensive upgrade.
#14
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Lake Murray, SC
Pedal Pusher hit the water last week for a short shake down cruise and another today. 900's per side will certainly get you past 100, 800's would do it also... Just got to figure out what you're going to connect that to. Bravos would seem like high maintenance. Six's would be an expensive upgrade.
#15
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Lake Murray, SC
I never hurt one of my bravos but the motors were only around 625 or so. I think the guys who bought broke one though. I think the bravos were safe when I had it because the water never gets that bad. The boat very rarely left and reentered the water.
#16
Registered

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Covington, LA
#19
Registered

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 21
From: MID MI
Yes -2 lowers would definitely help my speed and he also had the ITS boxes. Unfortunately, running the great lakes having standard lowers helps me run faster in bigger water than shorties would. Catch 22 for sure. He was also in salt I believe. I'd love to get 89 out of it!!
#20
Yes -2 lowers would definitely help my speed and he also had the ITS boxes. Unfortunately, running the great lakes having standard lowers helps me run faster in bigger water than shorties would. Catch 22 for sure. He was also in salt I believe. I'd love to get 89 out of it!!
Just for comparison, Dan (OL) ran about 91-92 (right Dan?) in his Gladiator with the same power and sporty's too if I recall properly.




