Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Powerquest (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/powerquest-49/)
-   -   34' Powerquest performance (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/powerquest/117409-34-powerquest-performance.html)

Mentalpause 01-01-2006 10:39 AM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 
:confused: :confused: :confused:

PWRQWST 01-01-2006 03:53 PM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 

Originally Posted by US1 Fountain
Alrighty, who made the road trip?

What road trip?

Knot 4 Me 01-01-2006 10:17 PM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 

Originally Posted by Macklin
That's why.

I said my guess was that it had 3 blades. I don't know that for sure.

US1 Fountain 01-02-2006 01:44 AM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 
The type of trip one takes when they go to look at a boat.

Mentalpause 01-02-2006 10:41 AM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 
wasn't me. My road trip was to check on the progress of the lake house. Not sure when the next trip is to check on the boat. Probably not until mid February or later.

Slick02 01-03-2006 12:22 PM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 

Originally Posted by MK
3 blades don't work - the boat was designed and tested with bravo 4 blades. It should have come from the factory with 4 blades but the dealer may have put the wrong props on the boat when it was put in the water.

Now ya tell me,,,,four years to late,,,yeah, mine came with 28 pitch 3 blade Bravo's on it also..In fact I still have a pair of spare 28 3 blade bravo's if anyone needs some..

Macklin 01-04-2006 06:45 AM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 
Slick, are you sure those were not 3 blade Mirages? :D

At any rate, It is sad to hear that you ran your 340 all that time with 3 blades. Sorry dude! But I have to say it is good that we got this information as it explains a lot.

JeffGrice 01-04-2006 07:16 PM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 
Hi,

I mentioned earlier that I have a 95 34 with 454mags/390 hp. I've had the factory 3 blades on this boat since new. Planes effortlessly, tops out at 71 and burns 12 gph. So I've been happy!. I assume it is working good, in contrast to the boat in reference with 3 blades, becasue the hull is non-step (V with a notch at the back). Is that correct?

Is there a benefit of moving to 4 blades on my boat?

Thanks.

Jeff

Mentalpause 01-04-2006 08:07 PM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 

Originally Posted by JeffGrice
Hi,

I mentioned earlier that I have a 95 34 with 454mags/390 hp. I've had the factory 3 blades on this boat since new. Planes effortlessly, tops out at 71 and burns 12 gph. So I've been happy!. I assume it is working good, in contrast to the boat in reference with 3 blades, becasue the hull is non-step (V with a notch at the back). Is that correct?

Is there a benefit of moving to 4 blades on my boat?

Thanks.

Jeff

Are you burning 12 gallons per hour at WOT (71mph)? If so you are getting 6 miles per gallon. :eek:

That would be sweet - I only got 1.1 MPG at wide open throttle with my 454 mags (385 hp) in a 32 Sunsation. Don't think I ever burned 12 gallons per hour, except maybe at idle. My most efficient crusing speed was about 2700 RPM, where I would cruise about 40. I never had a flow meter on it, but I figured then I was burning about 16-18 gallons per hour.

JeffGrice 01-04-2006 08:29 PM

Re: 34' Powerquest performance
 
Sorry, 12 gph overall..... We drive mostly around 38-40.

Its been real effecient.

Jeff


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.