![]() |
Formula 311...
So I posted this in the formula section too.. but also am going to put it here to get more exposure. I have a 89 311 with 330s. It came with the stock 23 3 blade mirages. I never tried these props on the boat as I bought the boat as a project. I bought a set of 24 hydromotive as many people recommended them. Well after a summer of running I think I'm going to start messing with props. So it runs 60 mph at 4000 rpm, with 2 people 75-90 gallons of fuel and coolers. Won't pull past 4000 though. Also the boat starts to have a porpoise problem once you start trimming too. So my question is do you think I should switch to a 24 bravo since the prop is 1" smaller in diameter then a hydromotive, which in turn might let me turn more rpm, I mean I only need like 400 rpm more cause you don't turn these little 330hp much more then that. Or do you think I should step down to a 22 pitch hydromotive? Also I'm wondering if the hydromotive style cleaver prop is causing the porpoise?
Thanks!! |
Hydro Q4's are totally wrong for that hull. The drives are set deep and you should run the Mirage 23's.
You want to spin 330's to 4600-4700rpms for the best performance. |
So you don't think bravos would be good? I'm not a fan of three blades...always seem to blow out and slip really bad..
|
Best performance will most likely be with Mirage or Mirage Plus props.
You might see a few extra mph at cruise speeds with Bravo props, but on a 1989 hull, the drives are set way deep so they should not be needed. |
I agree the Mirage Plus series is the props to go with.
In a 4 blade prop I would try a Revolution 4. We have both these props for testing. I think your speedo might be off since the numbers you post suggest a 1% slip and that is impossible for your hull. Brett |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.