![]() |
22' Scarab, or Baja 20' Outlaw?
I'm looking for opinions on the 95-98 Scarab 22', vs. the Baja 20 Outlaw. I think the overall length of either should be pretty close, which is a big deal for storage for me, but I'm looking for opinions on why I should choose one over the other (I'm assuming I'm going to hear that the Scarab is the better choice in this forum, but I'd like to hear some reasoning as to why -- build quality, rougher water handling, etc -- and yes, I know that neither is a rough water boat.)
Thanks! |
I owned a 22' Scarab (1995 w/7.4 carb) and loved it. Probably the most reliable boat I ever owned. My friend had the 20' Baja ( i think it may have been a 20.5?) and he had it for a year and sold it and moved up to a 38' Special.I personally like the Scarab............Mike
|
I used to have a 1998 22' Scarab. The boat wasnt happy going much over 75mph. I do know where there is a very sick 20 Outlaw for sale http://www.speedwake.com/newclassifi...uct=448&cat=35
I would deffinitly check this boat out |
Originally Posted by Unitek
(Post 2271664)
I used to have a 1998 22' Scarab. The boat wasnt happy going much over 75mph. I do know where there is a very sick 20 Outlaw for sale http://www.speedwake.com/newclassifi...uct=448&cat=35
I would deffinitly check this boat out |
Your right the cabin does look huge,especially being 2' shorter than the Scarab.Although I see the Baja doesn't have an integral swimstep so could come out to about 22' total.
|
Originally Posted by Michael Garibay
(Post 2271792)
Your right the cabin does look huge,especially being 2' shorter than the Scarab.Although I see the Baja doesn't have an integral swimstep so could come out to about 22' total.
|
Originally Posted by agchoset
(Post 2271727)
You sure that's a 20? cabin looks huge.
|
think long term
If you're looking at the newer 20' Outlaw versus an almost 10-year-old Scarab, one thing to consider is the age of the materials in the Scarab as opposed to the Baja. I owned a 22 Scarab and loved the boat, but it had the old-style plywood floor with glued-down carpet over it. Depending on how many times that got wet through the years, you could end up with soft spots in the wood and possibly have to replace the floor. The 20 Outlaw, on the other hand, if I'm not mistaken, should be built with a fiberglass liner that's integral to the deck. And fiberglass can handle getting wet better than wood. Finally, with a newer EFI motor, it should be more hassle free. You're right about both being about the same length on the water.
Hope this helps. |
Originally Posted by rolling writer
(Post 2271935)
If you're looking at the newer 20' Outlaw versus an almost 10-year-old Scarab, one thing to consider is the age of the materials in the Scarab as opposed to the Baja. I owned a 22 Scarab and loved the boat, but it had the old-style plywood floor with glued-down carpet over it. Depending on how many times that got wet through the years, you could end up with soft spots in the wood and possibly have to replace the floor. The 20 Outlaw, on the other hand, if I'm not mistaken, should be built with a fiberglass liner that's integral to the deck. And fiberglass can handle getting wet better than wood. Finally, with a newer EFI motor, it should be more hassle free. You're right about both being about the same length on the water.
Hope this helps. |
are we talking a new outlaw (02-current) or the previous generation? because the newer style has a 21 degree deadrise (previous was 20 degree) and gained 300lbs. I'm not sure on the weight or deadrise on the scarab, I think the scarab might be a little heavier. IMO the scarab hull has a little more of the "mini offshore" look over the OL so pushing the nose down with some tabs in the rough stuff might net a better ride...but that's just an obeservation/opinion.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.