View Poll Results: Bad Ass vs. bad Ass
Whipple GTO (new) with some scoops



15
36.59%
Roisg Mustang



26
63.41%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll
Roush Stang vs. Whipple GTO
#1
Which one would you prefer? GTO for me. Awsome bad ass scoops and you got a sick ride. Priced one out 33,000 with whipple arounf 40,000 tops. They are coming out with a judge ram air edition.
Meant Jack Roush Edition Mustang
Meant Jack Roush Edition Mustang
Last edited by TeamSaris; 04-10-2006 at 07:22 PM.
#5
The GTO was originated by Holden, which is an Austrailian company/subsidiary of GM, just like Buick, Chevrolet, Pontiac. On paper, its numbers make for a sharp car, but it really does look like a goofy Grand-Am. It will never be known as a popular muscle car. Its a cheap cost for GM to market the car in the US, but it won't last long; surprised its even lasted as long as it has.
Too bad I sold my Avalanche. I could have smoked all of them.

They have an "El Camino-ish" version in Austrailia and New Zealand which is wildly popular.
http://www.genmay.net/showthread.php?t=233365
Too bad I sold my Avalanche. I could have smoked all of them.

They have an "El Camino-ish" version in Austrailia and New Zealand which is wildly popular.
http://www.genmay.net/showthread.php?t=233365
Last edited by Sydwayz; 04-10-2006 at 08:54 PM.
#6
I would have to go with the Mustang. We got our Cobra from Superformance last month and we ordered it with a Roush 402SR. I can tell you that this is one nasty engine and that this thing will solid move.
#10
Originally Posted by JohnJan
I can tell you my stock 2005 GTO has stomped every Rustang that's dared to pick a fight with me. By a very large margin.



