Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Pump gas, compression, and boats.... >

Pump gas, compression, and boats....

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Pump gas, compression, and boats....

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-26-2007 | 10:47 PM
  #1  
PorscheSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 477
Likes: 1
From: Catawba Island, Ohio
Default Pump gas, compression, and boats....

OK, opinion time:

How high of a compression ratio do you think is safe for pump (91/93 octane) gas?

No knock sensor, so no safety there.

I'm leaning towards something such as: You need not plan building a boat engine that depends on 91 or higher unless you have your own fuel truck, and or never plan on traveling out of range of said fuel truck and or inland gas station. High compression boats, turbine boats..ect. ect...Having to plan your every move around the fuel guage and present location takes a HUGE! chunk out of the boating fun factor.
PorscheSpeed is offline  
Reply
Old 07-26-2007 | 11:15 PM
  #2  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
Default

Originally Posted by PorscheSpeed
OK, opinion time:

How high of a compression ratio do you think is safe for pump (91/93 octane) gas?

No knock sensor, so no safety there.

I'm leaning towards something such as: You need not plan building a boat engine that depends on 91 or higher unless you have your own fuel truck, and or never plan on traveling out of range of said fuel truck and or inland gas station. High compression boats, turbine boats..ect. ect...Having to plan your every move around the fuel guage and present location takes a HUGE! chunk out of the boating fun factor.
Depends on the engine, but with a Big Block Chevy, that would be about 9:1.

Michael
Michael1 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-26-2007 | 11:25 PM
  #3  
PorscheSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 477
Likes: 1
From: Catawba Island, Ohio
Default

staying small block for this project, didnt want to mess with relocating exhaust and motor mounts and all that comes with it..
PorscheSpeed is offline  
Reply
Old 07-26-2007 | 11:45 PM
  #4  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,656
Likes: 20
From: Lake Michigan
Default

http://www.blowerdriveservice.com/techcharts.php
Back4More is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2007 | 01:10 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 988
Likes: 2
From: San Diego
Default

If you run a small block, with aluminum heads and keep the temp at 160 or below, a 10-1 compression ratio should be no problem.


Darrell.
DMOORE is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2007 | 06:47 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Default

If this is a N/A engine build. I have run as much as 11.5:1 on 91 octane with no problems. There are some key factors of course which go with keeping them alive. Aluminum heads , water temp through engine 125-140 , ignition timing, Water volume to engine, and fuel curve. If you want to be very conservative .....not knowing every detail of your set up....stay around 10.0:1
mrhorsepower1 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2007 | 07:36 AM
  #7  
t500hps's Avatar
21 and 42 footers
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,207
Likes: 146
From: Richmond VA
Default

I'm running 9.75 compression 540's. Dyno pulls were made with 93 and 89. 93 was fine of course, 89 could be run comfortably up to 4,000 rpm's. Once approaching 5,000 the knock sensor starting going off. If I'm ever out of range of 93 octane pumps I just need to keep from hammering on the throttles and everything should be fine. This info came from Mark at Precision Marine in New Orleans.
t500hps is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2007 | 08:52 AM
  #8  
PorscheSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 477
Likes: 1
From: Catawba Island, Ohio
Default

No blowers, N/A for the win...

With 64cc heads (which I have not aquired yet) we would be pushing 11:1.... Now I am going to go with larger cc heads to keep the compression down. 10.6:1 pistons and they took .080 off the deck, also had to go .040 over. #8 cyl had a bad taper to it.
PorscheSpeed is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2007 | 08:56 AM
  #9  
JDB1981's Avatar
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 2
From: JACKSONVILLE FL
Default

i have a 598 with 10:2:1 it runs fine with 93 but i have back the timing down about 2 degrees and that is a 30' boat
JDB1981 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-27-2007 | 10:58 AM
  #10  
BY U BOY's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,779
Likes: 1
From: HOUSTON ,TX
Default

i have had no problems with my 454 with aluminum heads at 10.7:1 on 93 octane.
BY U BOY is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nice Pair
General Boating Discussion
37
09-09-2024 08:12 AM
stormbauer
General Q & A
193
12-04-2008 12:22 PM
Prostreeter
General Q & A
4
06-30-2006 07:28 PM
26scarab
General Boating Discussion
11
11-13-2002 07:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.