Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Outboard HP vs Sterndrive HP >

Outboard HP vs Sterndrive HP

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Outboard HP vs Sterndrive HP

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-18-2007 | 08:00 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Default Outboard HP vs Sterndrive HP

Is it apples and apples OR apples and oranges?

Given two otherwise identical boats, one powered by a Mercury 300XS the other powered by a 350 MAG MPI (300hp).

Which will be faster??
towhead is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-2007 | 08:50 AM
  #2  
OkieTunnel's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Default

Apples and oranges. Outboards weigh alot less per HP.
OkieTunnel is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-2007 | 12:40 PM
  #3  
dkwestern's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,976
Likes: 0
From: Lake St. Clair
Default

Outboard would spank it by a long shot
dkwestern is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-2007 | 12:45 PM
  #4  
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Torque is the key and is what moves the boat. The 350 mag will have a lot more torque than the OB. The outboard has a lot more RPM range though. In rough water, normally the stern drive will push through the waves better. The OB is normally not quite as deep in the water and it will have less torque to push through the waves better. Single OB's are good for light fishing boats. Single sterndrives for run-a-bout ski boats (torque for pulling skiers).
THLWL is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-2007 | 12:48 PM
  #5  
Dave M's Avatar
Gold Member
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,664
Likes: 140
From: Hollywood, MD, USA
Default

Using my hull as an example..........

A 300x, twin 200's and a 496HO (425 HP) all run very close to the same speed.

Like already mentioned, the weight is a big factor.
Dave M is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-2007 | 12:55 PM
  #6  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 85
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Originally Posted by towhead
Is it apples and apples OR apples and oranges?

Given two otherwise identical boats, one powered by a Mercury 300XS the other powered by a 350 MAG MPI (300hp).

Which will be faster??

You really have to compare a smaller, higher power I/O to the outboard.

Generally speaking, that 350 mag / 300 HP will outlast the outboard by a long shot. More cubes per HP generally means longer life. But, more cubes per HP means more weight and a slower boat.
VetteLT193 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-2007 | 12:58 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 1
From: Austin,Texas
Default

There was a point in time where an outboard needed less hp to match a stern drive in speed. Possibly 75 percent as much. Now that everything is surfacing and jacked to the moon they are closer but OB are still a little faster.
Jim
MOBILEMERCMAN is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-2007 | 07:29 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Lake Gaston NC
Default

Outboard by far. I like the sound a V-8 makes with thru hulls vs an outboard tin peck sound, but when you figure the weight difference and compare weight to HP ration the outboard will always be on top in performance. I think my 240 Mercury weighs 341 lbs, thats everything, top to bottom, and could be made to weigh as little 300 if it was put on a diet.
Mercury_Challenger is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-2007 | 07:42 PM
  #9  
ToTheMax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: 30,000 Islands Georgian Bay Ontario Canada
Default

Can't deny the power-weight ratio, especially in boats. Outboard will win every time, although the I/O will have an edge in rough stuff, again weight is the factor here.
ToTheMax is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-2007 | 07:52 PM
  #10  
OSO's Avatar
OSO
Charter Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 2
Default

when you load an outboard boat with fuel and people it is going to show its true colors real quick. An I/O with the same weight and fuel added will not lose the mph that the outboard loses.

A high torque, high hp 2 stroke will come close to an I/O in characteristics but a 4 stroke no chance.

As far as maintenance I will take an outboard any day. Less lower unit repairs, no headers to leak, no chance of reversion, etc.

Problem is to achieve the speeds we like in the size boat we like to be comfortable in the transom does not have enough room to accomodate the hp needed. In some cases the stacks of outboards on the back effects the performace of the boat, attitude of the boat, etc.

Remember the gyro effect a stack of outboard motors have all turning the same direction (motor not prop rotation) stacked on the transom of a boat.

2 CC 33 Powerplays, one with 300X's 73 mph, the other with 502 MPI's 415hp per side 76mph.
OSO is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.