Why not fiberglass?
#3
a solid fiberglass transom is gonna weigh about a thousand pounds or more
there are some composite methods such as Coosa (
. . . yes . . . i said it) but i dont care for it in the high stress offshore environment.
there are some composite methods such as Coosa (
. . . yes . . . i said it) but i dont care for it in the high stress offshore environment.
__________________
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )
#6
#10
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
Two simple reasons...
1. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".
and
2. Cost.
Plywood just works. It has good weight-to-strength ratio and failures are pretty much non-existant. Composites are more rot resistant but on a well-built and properly-maintained boat, wooden-cored transoms don't rot anyway. Composites aren't totally waterproof either- ask anyone with a big cruiser that didn't keep up with gelcoat blisters- the repairs can be very expensive.
A transom could be made out of a composite material-combinations of plys, cores and honeycombs. But why? The failure rates are next to zero. For equivalent performance the weight savings would probably be single digits and the cost addition would be in the thousands.
1. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".
and
2. Cost.
Plywood just works. It has good weight-to-strength ratio and failures are pretty much non-existant. Composites are more rot resistant but on a well-built and properly-maintained boat, wooden-cored transoms don't rot anyway. Composites aren't totally waterproof either- ask anyone with a big cruiser that didn't keep up with gelcoat blisters- the repairs can be very expensive.
A transom could be made out of a composite material-combinations of plys, cores and honeycombs. But why? The failure rates are next to zero. For equivalent performance the weight savings would probably be single digits and the cost addition would be in the thousands.




