Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Lightweight driveshafts? >

Lightweight driveshafts?

Notices

Lightweight driveshafts?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-08-2008 | 12:20 AM
  #1  
2112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 12
From: Socialist Republic of Washington State
Question Lightweight driveshafts?

Anyone here have a carbon Fiber or aluminum driveshaft made to replace the heavy merc unit in an staggered set up?

If so, do you have recommendations for who to go to?
2112 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-08-2008 | 09:18 PM
  #2  
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Default

I have used Dynotech Driveshafts, Troy, MI (800 633 5559) to recondition, high speed balance and modify my Stellings driveshafts. They also make steel, aluminum and composite driveshafts. www.dynotecheng.com
BenPerfected is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-2008 | 06:20 PM
  #3  
2112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 12
From: Socialist Republic of Washington State
Default

Thanks;

Anyone know how much parasitic loss can be attributed to the forward motor in a staggered application?

Has anyone corrected this in the prop pitch?
2112 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-2008 | 06:41 PM
  #4  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,042
Likes: 712
From: Toledo Oh
Default

compared to parasitic losses in the drive, Im not an engineer, but given a relatively true alignment, and running on good pillow blocks/bearings the loss wouldnt really be significant to the application. Now if it were say a drag boat, maybe, as the weight would only an enertial detriment to acceleration. in an offshore boat that extra spinning mass might theoretically help to absorb the shock of the prop comming out of the water before it reaches the coupler/engine.
phragle is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-2008 | 10:15 PM
  #5  
JCPERF's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 9
From: Long Island,New York
Default

Like Phragle said,It should only effect acceleration
JCPERF is offline  
Reply
Old 09-09-2008 | 10:57 PM
  #6  
2112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 12
From: Socialist Republic of Washington State
Default

Well, It does take more fuel to keep it matched to the non shaft engine when accelerating and when the day is done, overall fuel consumption is about 4-5% more as well.

These two engines were within 2hp at nearly all points on the RPM scale on the dyno so I am trying to deduce why the need for extra fuel.

I am also not running CNC'd props yet. Each set I have used do the same thing but to a lesser degree with the bigger pitched props.
2112 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Njawb
General Boating Discussion
4
06-28-2008 02:43 PM
88Fount33
General Q & A
4
12-31-2005 12:37 PM
THRILLSEEKER
Detailing, Painting, & Fiberglass
0
08-31-2005 08:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.