Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Rec vs Oval port? >

Rec vs Oval port?

Notices

Rec vs Oval port?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-18-2002 | 08:45 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
From: Ontario,Canada
Default Rec vs Oval port?

I have a 1978 25ft Magnum heavy lay up.It has a 365hp Mag BB chev with rec port heads. TRS drive, would I see any improvment in acceleration or wot mph gain if I swiched to oval port heads? I get 61 mph at 5050rpm now with a 23p re- piched to 24p, old quicksilver cleaver.
Andy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2002 | 09:01 PM
  #2  
puder's Avatar
speel chekk this fokker!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 1
From: Locust Valley, New York
Default

hmmmm thats odd. As far as i know teh rectangle port heads are bigger than the performance (large) ovals so i woudl tend to hink smaller ports might just slow you down.

You coudl pobably have your curent heads worked a little to make them flow more air andtheat might help you pick up some HP and speed.
__________________
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
puder is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2002 | 09:11 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 3
From: PA and MD
Default

You might call and talk with JimV. He can put 'wedges' in your heads and mild port work and really wake them up.
cobra marty is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2002 | 09:18 PM
  #4  
obnoxus's Avatar
Charter Member #1171
20 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,018
Likes: 21
From: Clearwater, FL
Default

Just read an article in Family and Performance boating that said they tested 2 identicle motors 1 with rec ports and 1 with oval,,, the oval porst made more HP and torque, and in a more usable power band.
__________________
I want to live in a world where a chicken can cross the road and not have its motives questioned.
obnoxus is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2002 | 09:58 PM
  #5  
Tinkerer's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 7
From: ALTO, MI
Thumbs up

Jim Valekeo did my heads. I am running the stock GM rec. port and Jim put the wedges in them and 2.3 intake valves and a bunch of grinding later and my engines really came alive. Jim can set you up with a complete package deal....
Tinkerer is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-2002 | 11:08 PM
  #6  
Bo Knows
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

I've been doing a LOT of research on this because I'm thinking of putting some different heads on my motors. What I've come up with is the oval port high performance heads have smaller intake ports but they make more torque & horsepower at lower rpm's. Unless you plan on running above 6,000 rpm's you will make more horsepower with them & go faster. If you do buy new heads somethings I would look for are heads with intake port volume around 260cc, combstion chamber volume around 118cc, valve size 2.19 intake & 1.88 exhaust, and as long as you have them off I would get them mildly ported, unshroud the valves a little, clean out the bowl & runner area, & make sure the intake & exhaust line up. As far as aluminum vs cast I think I'm going with the cast because of the price difference & because I've heard a few stories of head gasket & corrosion problems with the aluminum. Did you have a particular head in mind ? Please keep us posted! good luck !
 
Reply
Old 03-18-2002 | 11:33 PM
  #7  
crmax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: sheffield lake ohio
Default

obnoxus,

what type of oval port heads did they use for the test??
crmax is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-2002 | 12:42 AM
  #8  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,232
Likes: 2,482
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

What generation block are you using?? If its a Gen V, then going to GM large oval ports won't work. If it's a Mark IV then they'll be fine. On a Gen V, you would have to go with an aftermarket heads.
Most of your performance increase would be in the lower and midrange area, with maybe a slight increase on the top.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-2002 | 08:58 AM
  #9  
obnoxus's Avatar
Charter Member #1171
20 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,018
Likes: 21
From: Clearwater, FL
Default

CR max,
they were Edelbrocks,,, the bare casting prt # was 7161 which did include valves,, I did not get a price,,,, for complete heads with Inconel exhaust valves ready to bolt on were just under $700 a piece,,, like $683 I think,,,, did not get p`ricing on cam and injection work yet.
__________________
I want to live in a world where a chicken can cross the road and not have its motives questioned.
obnoxus is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-2002 | 09:45 AM
  #10  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: ST. Louis, MO, USA
Default

I saw an article by Teague in PB a few years ago. They pretty much agreed with Bo. Better midrange with the ovals. And unless your pushing over 500hp, there wasn't much of an increase in hp with rec. port. They also mentioned that even in higher hp applications they liked to stay with oval ports on single engine boats for the added low/mid range torque.
Gary
Gary Anderson is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.