Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Velocity
velocity 22, rough water handling >

velocity 22, rough water handling

Notices

velocity 22, rough water handling

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-24-2009 | 01:58 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 2
From: Lake St. Louis, MO
Default velocity 22, rough water handling

Thinking about picking up a 22 i/o and ive heard mixed reviews. I know it's a driver's boat and keeping it on the pad is the key, but what are everyone's opinion on running one in 2-3 footers? Some say it's the best 22 in rough water, others say stay away.

Advice??
schmiddy is offline  
Reply
Old 08-24-2009 | 02:40 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, Ga.
Default

I have a 22 and it handles moderate rough water pretty well. The faster you run and the flatter you keep it the better the ride is. Don't get me wrong, it can beat you up at times, but it is only a 22 foot boat!! I would like to put a nice set of tabs on mine to see how much of a difference it makes!!

They are a very fun boat to drive, and yes, they are a drivers boat for sure.
DKerns is offline  
Reply
Old 08-24-2009 | 07:58 PM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 1
From: MD
Default

I owned a 1984 velocity 22 for over 10 years in the Caribbean and it was a good in the rough stuff, it does beat you up a bit. It was rigged with a merc 3.4 liter. It's a drivers boat above 65mph, but nothing to out of the ordinary.
I sold my 1st velocity about 6 years ago and recently acquired another velocity, a 2004 velocity 220 to run on the Chesapeake.
click on the link: http://forums.screamandfly.com/forum...&postcount=373
modvp is offline  
Reply
Old 08-25-2009 | 11:17 AM
  #4  
Revelocity's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 697
Likes: 58
From: Warwick, MD USA
Default

What Dwayne said. An occasional 3' is ok but ultimately it's a swivel bucket seat boat (unless rigged specially) with less then ideal throttle placement so that by itself is a limitation for the rough stuff. Tabs definitely help the boat attitude and speed helps until you outrun the 22' hull length. Don't get hung up about always having to stay on the pad - you'll learn that there are conditions to ride high on the pad and there are times not to. While the boat has a good ride for 22' thanks to the long running surface, if you're going to run in 2's to 3's every day, I'd recommend getting a bigger boat regardless of what brand you buy.
Revelocity is offline  
Reply
Old 08-26-2009 | 08:50 AM
  #5  
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 638
From: Lakewood, NY, USA
Default

I had a 1989 Velocity (Regal) 23 footer. Same hull but likely a little heavier. IMO opinion it rides as good if not better then most 22s. You do need to get out in the rougher water and play in order to understand how to run it and what it will do and what it won't but I guess that is true with any boat.
Padraig is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2009 | 05:58 PM
  #6  
Platinum Member
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 119
Likes: 3
From: New York
Default

If rough water is the primary concern, I would say that there are better options in that size hull
GregGuimond is offline  
Reply
Old 09-19-2009 | 04:22 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Long Island NY
Default Hands down if you take the time to dial it in its the best rough water hull that size

Not the softest or fastest top speed. But if you have the balls you can make that boat do monkey tricks. But it has to be set up right which is very time consuming. In my 85 22 2.5/280hp it ran 76.5 @ 7500 consistantly on gps,no set back and a big ear 22 chopper. 2-3 where a joke. Could run mid to high 60s through that . 4 and 5s slowed down the pace a bit.Last I saw my old hull was for sale.
PIT BULL is offline  
Reply
Old 09-21-2009 | 10:34 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

I have kiekeffer trim tabs on my 22' and still have probs keeping the bow down. If i run the tabs way down (like 6+ on kiekeffer indicators), tuck the drive all the way under and keep it at 40mph+ it does pretty good but ends up sucking down a lot more fuel. I guess it depends on what kind of 2-3's we're talking, swells with mild chop it does great (and is a riot), 2-3 just chop it slaps pretty hard. I need to talk to BBlades and see if I can't run a little flatter.

I raced a 38 formula fastech in 2/3 swells and made a fool out of him in front of his buddies. Him and his buddies had pretty big grins on their faces when they came up on me, not so much when I walked away from them. The guys that where with me said he had the boat completely out of the water a few times so he was definitely trying.
DisturbedVelo22 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-2009 | 12:40 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod
Default

Will the boat handle that kind of pounding without structural issues? How much i/o power would you need to get one to 65? 70?
dba900 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-22-2009 | 02:02 PM
  #10  
Pat McPherson's Avatar
VIP Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,246
Likes: 3
From: Ivoryton, CT
Default

Originally Posted by dba900
Will the boat handle that kind of pounding without structural issues? How much i/o power would you need to get one to 65? 70?
The boats built by Steve Stepp will take a pounding.
The boats built by Regal? Not from what I've seen.

From what I've heard and read, a 300HP sb will get you to 65.
__________________
Patrick
Pat McPherson is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.