If you had the choice of these 2 motors...what would YOU pick and why?

Option 1: built 496 (not too radical) with (I'm guessing) about 430-440 hp. The motor is beautiful, stainless lines, powdercoated covers, etc... Very attractive and would look great in this boat. I'm told it will probably need valve adjustments a couple times per year, and likely need more maintenance than a stock motor.

Option 2: Reman 502 (415 hp - bone stock). Nothing fancy...drop in a 502 and go. Change the oil once per season and be done with it.

Option 2 will probably save me a little $$, but I'm not sure if that really matters that much. I doubt it will be much $$ difference in price.

I'm torn. On one hand...the HP is not that much different between the 2, but on the other the 502 is "stock" and the 496 is not.

The 502 has stronger internals and is a much better platform for when you get the need for speed. I've got a 502 and wouldn't even consider anything else.

By the way the 496 is dead and Merc is bringing back the 502 for 2010 (albeit with cats). It'll have 430hp.

Easy choice. 502

I'm guessing the 496 is a stroked 454?

Either way for the minimal hp difference i'd go 502.

The new (reman) 502 in stock form is the way I've been leaning when I think logically/sensibly.

But then again...since when is owning one of these freaking boats EVER been considered a logical/sensible decision?

Why would you want to adjust valves a couple of times a year? Not me, I'd rather be out playing. Boats are enough hassle when everything is working fine, go with the one that is less fuss. Not enough hp to make a difference anyway. 502...no brainer.