Confusing Prop #'s and Porpoise
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
From: marbury, md
Im confused, I have a '98 25' Active Thunder, with a Stellings box and a 1.5" spacer which puts the propshaft 3" below the hull(no hook).
When I run a stock 26 Bravo I turn 4900-5000 rpm going 69-70 mph on gps(15% slip).
When I run a stock 28 Bravo(solid hub), I turn 5000-5100 rpm doing 73-74 mph on gps(18% slip)
With these props, any speed above low 60's the boat porpoises, so with both set ups Im porpoising at WOT on calm water. the only thing that stops it is a lot of tab, i have tried tucking the drive and neutral.
My thought is that if I could get rid of the porpoise I would go faster and have better slip numbers. So do I need different props or do one of mine need to be worked?
When I run a stock 26 Bravo I turn 4900-5000 rpm going 69-70 mph on gps(15% slip).
When I run a stock 28 Bravo(solid hub), I turn 5000-5100 rpm doing 73-74 mph on gps(18% slip)
With these props, any speed above low 60's the boat porpoises, so with both set ups Im porpoising at WOT on calm water. the only thing that stops it is a lot of tab, i have tried tucking the drive and neutral.
My thought is that if I could get rid of the porpoise I would go faster and have better slip numbers. So do I need different props or do one of mine need to be worked?
#2
So, is the condition caused by the prop or the hull? I'd try a different kind of prop (or two) to see. Have you tried a 4 blade on that hull? Many older deep V hulls really like them.
Older 25' Checkmates (early 1990's) used to be famous for the same kind of behavior. The standard cure back then was to fill and sharpen the trailing edge of the running surface at the transom. From the factory, it was beveled to make it easier to pull the hull from the mold. Believe it or not, this little modification did wonders.
Older 25' Checkmates (early 1990's) used to be famous for the same kind of behavior. The standard cure back then was to fill and sharpen the trailing edge of the running surface at the transom. From the factory, it was beveled to make it easier to pull the hull from the mold. Believe it or not, this little modification did wonders.
#3
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
From: marbury, md
the Bravo's are 4 blades.
the hull has sharp edges, that was the first thing I noticed before I bought it. It does not seem to have any rocker and deffinately no hook.
the hull has sharp edges, that was the first thing I noticed before I bought it. It does not seem to have any rocker and deffinately no hook.
Last edited by My Addiction; 09-16-2010 at 06:59 PM.
#4
Platinum Member

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 3
From: Brookfield, Wi.
So, is the condition caused by the prop or the hull? I'd try a different kind of prop (or two) to see. Have you tried a 4 blade on that hull? Many older deep V hulls really like them.
Older 25' Checkmates (early 1990's) used to be famous for the same kind of behavior. The standard cure back then was to fill and sharpen the trailing edge of the running surface at the transom. From the factory, it was beveled to make it easier to pull the hull from the mold. Believe it or not, this little modification did wonders.
Older 25' Checkmates (early 1990's) used to be famous for the same kind of behavior. The standard cure back then was to fill and sharpen the trailing edge of the running surface at the transom. From the factory, it was beveled to make it easier to pull the hull from the mold. Believe it or not, this little modification did wonders.
#6
Actually, I meant 4 blades. We've had some pretty decent luck on older boats where the drive is buried and the extra lift of the 4 blade props really wakes them up. Since you've already got one, here's another thought. Not all boats like the extra blades and lift. I tried a 4 blade Spinelli on my Progression and it was downright scary. Too much stern lift. So, back to a 3 blade. Have you tried a 3 blade?
Of course your best bet is to contact Brett at Bblades. I'm sure he can help you.
Of course your best bet is to contact Brett at Bblades. I'm sure he can help you.
#7
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
From: marbury, md
Is propshaft 3" below hull considered deep or buried? Should I try taking out the drive spacer? Previous owner installed it so the boat would plane better.
I tried a 25" mirage + early on because that was what I used on my Baja 226 when I had this motor in it, It blew out way too easy on the Active Thunder. I was told that was probably due to the extension box?
Could it be porpoising becaouse it is trying to lift the bow too much, then falling off?
Yeah Im hoping Brett will chime in. Im sure I will end up needing his help.
I tried a 25" mirage + early on because that was what I used on my Baja 226 when I had this motor in it, It blew out way too easy on the Active Thunder. I was told that was probably due to the extension box?
Could it be porpoising becaouse it is trying to lift the bow too much, then falling off?
Yeah Im hoping Brett will chime in. Im sure I will end up needing his help.
#8
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,844
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton Florida
[QUOTE=My Addiction;3210903]Is propshaft 3" below hull considered deep or buried? Should I try taking out the drive spacer? Previous owner installed it so the boat would plane better.
QUOTE]
YES !!!!!!!
QUOTE]
YES !!!!!!!
#9
3" is not deep at all. Actually that is pretty high. If it was deeper, it may even be able to carry bow better, without dropping it. Also, you could try a 5 blade Maximus prop. It will give more stern lift and should the lift the boat more evenly. Maybe some added cup and/or rake to one of you current props would help also.
I know Gordo's 25 used to porpoise on smooth water also. With a decent chop it hardly did it at all. He tried an ext box and said the boat got pretty loose with it.
Slip is not always bad. Higher slip numbers reduce the stress on the drive.
I'm a little confused by your numbers though. Are they both WOT numbers???? The 26 should spin about 400rpms faster than the 28.
I know Gordo's 25 used to porpoise on smooth water also. With a decent chop it hardly did it at all. He tried an ext box and said the boat got pretty loose with it.
Slip is not always bad. Higher slip numbers reduce the stress on the drive.
I'm a little confused by your numbers though. Are they both WOT numbers???? The 26 should spin about 400rpms faster than the 28.
#10
Registered
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Rockford Mich
What are you runnig for power?
I had the same problem with my 28. I removed the spacer to bring the prop to the surface. I am 1 1/2 to 2 inches below the bottom with the shaft and run a 5blade Max. Problem totaly went away. But you have to have some air in the prop to make it work. Maxximus props do not have very low for pitch sizes.
I had the same problem with my 28. I removed the spacer to bring the prop to the surface. I am 1 1/2 to 2 inches below the bottom with the shaft and run a 5blade Max. Problem totaly went away. But you have to have some air in the prop to make it work. Maxximus props do not have very low for pitch sizes.




