Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
454(330hp) 049 heads w/ bigger valves...clearance issues? >

454(330hp) 049 heads w/ bigger valves...clearance issues?

Notices

454(330hp) 049 heads w/ bigger valves...clearance issues?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-23-2010 | 08:49 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: CONCORD, CALIF
Default 454(330hp) 049 heads w/ bigger valves...clearance issues?

My "winter upgrades" to my 454 has changed direction a bit. I found a small problem with the peanut port heads that were on the motor and sense they would have needed some work and I'm bolting a large oval intake in the motor I decided to upgrade the heads to the 049's. The heads I bought have bigger valves in them (2.19 int & 1.88 ext). Sense I have gone this far........I am tossing around the idea of changing the cam.
Has anyone thrown a set of 049's or 781's on a stock bottom end of a 454 (330hp) and put a cam in at the same time???? I'm wondering if I'm going to run into piston to valve clearance problems with the bigger valves or more lift? I'm looking at bringing the lift up to somewhere around 0.530-0.540 but due to the stock bottom-end don't want to spin past 5,000rpm for now.
Any recommendations on a good preforming hydraulic flat tappet cam would be helpful. Thanks guys!
mustangmark is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2010 | 10:22 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 3
From: OFallon,Mo.
Default

Should be no problem with valve to piston clearance using a cam with lift in the range your considering. As long as you stay under .600 lift there should be no worry. The intake your using I hope is a dual plane. You would want to use a 750 CFM carb on that also. Comp cams make some good marine cams at a reasonable price for a upgrade like your doing. The 262 or 270 would probably be what your looking for. Here's a list of their cams at Jegs. Next thing you might want to consider is exhaust. Everything has to be compatible for best results.

http://www.jegs.com/p/Comp-Cams/Comp...47427/10002/-1
picklenjim is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2010 | 10:51 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: CONCORD, CALIF
Default

Originally Posted by picklenjim
Should be no problem with valve to piston clearance using a cam with lift in the range your considering. As long as you stay under .600 lift there should be no worry. The intake your using I hope is a dual plane. You would want to use a 750 CFM carb on that also. Comp cams make some good marine cams at a reasonable price for a upgrade like your doing. The 262 or 270 would probably be what your looking for. Here's a list of their cams at Jegs. Next thing you might want to consider is exhaust. Everything has to be compatible for best results.

http://www.jegs.com/p/Comp-Cams/Comp...47427/10002/-1
Thanks for the info and suggestions! I have quite a bit going on with this motor this winter. I bought a holley 750dp, stainless marine exhaust, a performer rpm, roller rockers, 3/8th's push rods, msd ignition, a cross-over, etc... and now heads and a cam. Should be a nice running motor when I finally get it back together.
mustangmark is offline  
Reply
Old 11-23-2010 | 11:36 PM
  #4  
KAAMA's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 107
From: Western Michigan
Default

Several years ago my cousin rebuilt/upgraded his Merc 330's and used some old junk truck GM oval port semi open/closed chamber heads and installed the larger stainless 2.19" and 1.85" valves. The 1.85" actually breath better than the larger 1.88" valve---bigger is not always better. He also used a Comps Cam FLAT tappet hydraulic something like 222*/226* at .050" lift on 110* lobes and .515"/.515" lift, dual plane aluminum hi-rise intake, Holley carb, stock Merc Thunderbolt ignition, 8.6 comp ratio. The heads were pocket ported and flow tested by JimV and he also did a "Bore Notch" job on the cylinders of the blocks. The engines made 461hp @5100rpm and 500+ lbs of torque on Tom Earhart's dyno. He installed the engines back into his 32' Baja, added GIL dry exhaust system and noticed a very noticable pick up in speed and throttle response/torque and saw an increase of about 10-12mph on top.....especially in the midrange cruising speeds.

Anyway, Hope that helps you a little

Last edited by KAAMA; 11-23-2010 at 11:39 PM.
KAAMA is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2010 | 01:27 AM
  #5  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,248
Likes: 2,497
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

You won't have any clearance issues with a moderate cam. If you upgrade the cam to more than about the size of a 454mag, you will need aftermarket exhaust with longer risers.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2010 | 02:00 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: CONCORD, CALIF
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
You won't have any clearance issues with a moderate cam. If you upgrade the cam to more than about the size of a 454mag, you will need aftermarket exhaust with longer risers.
Hey Griff,
Fortunately, I bought stainless marine exhaust (gen 2) about 3 weeks ago. I never expected this project to take the turn it has but I suspect I'll be pretty happy with it when it's back together.
mustangmark is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2010 | 02:16 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: CONCORD, CALIF
Default

Originally Posted by KAAMA
Several years ago my cousin rebuilt/upgraded his Merc 330's and used some old junk truck GM oval port semi open/closed chamber heads and installed the larger stainless 2.19" and 1.85" valves. The 1.85" actually breath better than the larger 1.88" valve---bigger is not always better. He also used a Comps Cam FLAT tappet hydraulic something like 222*/226* at .050" lift on 110* lobes and .515"/.515" lift, dual plane aluminum hi-rise intake, Holley carb, stock Merc Thunderbolt ignition, 8.6 comp ratio. The heads were pocket ported and flow tested by JimV and he also did a "Bore Notch" job on the cylinders of the blocks. The engines made 461hp @5100rpm and 500+ lbs of torque on Tom Earhart's dyno. He installed the engines back into his 32' Baja, added GIL dry exhaust system and noticed a very noticable pick up in speed and throttle response/torque and saw an increase of about 10-12mph on top.....especially in the midrange cruising speeds.

Anyway, Hope that helps you a little

Hey Kaama,
I have a friend that's really sharp with bbc's (he won fastest street car shoot out back in the early 90's) that's going to supervise me on some some light port work and unshrouding in the chambers. I'm a little concerned about the lack of compression so hopefully we can deck the heads to get the compression ratio up a little or at least back to where it's at now after the chamber work is done on the new heads. If I can get 425-450hp out of this thing, I'll be happy. The boat is a 89 warlock euro 24 so it's pretty light. I suspect I'll feel some solid gains from everything I'm doing!

"Bore Notching" is notching the top of the cylinder at the deck correct? If so, I'm not going to be able to do that because I'm not pulling the motor. The only change to the short block is going to be the cam and timing chain. I have also bought a hp-6 filter head and replaced all the restrictive 90 degree fittings with summit push-lock -12 fittings and hose. I'm also considering a better cooler at this point but don't know if it's necessary with the hp this motor is going to put out.
mustangmark is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2010 | 12:05 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: CONCORD, CALIF
Default what about this cam?

Hey guys,
What do you think of this cam for what I'm doing? It's a Lunati Voodoo camshaft.

Advertised Duration (Int/Exh): 262/268
Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 219/227
Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .530/.542
LSA/ICL: 112/108
Valve Lash (Int/Exh): Hyd/Hyd
RPM Range: 1400-5800
mustangmark is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2010 | 12:18 PM
  #9  
Scarab28's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 552
Likes: 7
From: Roch, NY
Default

Cam and timing chain swap without pulling the motor - may be a little challenging.
Scarab28 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-2010 | 02:06 PM
  #10  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,248
Likes: 2,497
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

I used this cam with good results in a 454mag. Its also budget priced.

Crane #134241 #134242 is cam kit with lifters

http://www.summitracing.com/search/?...d=134241&dds=1
http://www.summitracing.com/search/?...d=134242&dds=1
Griff is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.