Notices
General Boating Discussion

8.2 MAG H.O. - 430hp

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-20-2011 | 07:23 AM
  #1  
fastedy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Charter Member
25 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
From: richmond virginia
Default 8.2 MAG H.O. - 430hp

Anyone have any insite on this motor vs the 496HO, it list as 5 more horsepower, is this the replacement motor for the 496?
__________________
"If Things Seem Under Control, You're Not Going Fast Enough"
Mario Andretti
fastedy is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2011 | 07:47 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Default

Merc had one in their booth at the show yesterday. Didn't look to long. No blower or turbo on it. I believe it is a replacement for the 425ho mag. They had quite a display of all their stuff including all their new package's. I noticed that stuff they were not going forward with was not there like the 1200sc's, but I did not notice if they had a 496 on display or not.
ElimiNordic is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2011 | 07:52 AM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,822
Likes: 376
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by fastedy
it list as 5 more horsepower, is this the replacement motor for the 496?
Yes
boatnt is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2011 | 09:00 AM
  #4  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 417
Likes: 13
From: Birch Run, MI
Default

GM is not building the 496 anymore, so Merc went back with the good ole 502
rexcramer1 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2011 | 10:19 AM
  #5  
Dave M's Avatar
Gold Member
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,664
Likes: 140
From: Hollywood, MD, USA
Default

Does the new motor have a catalytic converter?
Dave M is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2011 | 11:11 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Dave M
Does the new motor have a catalytic converter?
Yes but there are ways around that.

SDFever is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2011 | 11:55 AM
  #7  
Sydwayz's Avatar
Forum Regulator
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
VIP Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 24,211
Likes: 1,608
From: Worldwide
Default

1) They are kind of a ***** to rig with tailpipes and Captain's call as the manifold/cc exit is about a foot farther aft than any other engine.
2) The cc definitely makes the engine compartment VERY hot. Heat in the box slows you down; no matter what engine you've got.

Other than that, they appear to be great motors.
Sydwayz is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2011 | 11:59 AM
  #8  
DPT MOTORSPORTS's Avatar
LOOK AT THE LEAD NOW!!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 1
From: Beachwood, NJ
Default

Yes it is Eddie!
DPT MOTORSPORTS is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2011 | 12:13 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fastedy
Anyone have any insite on this motor vs the 496HO, it list as 5 more horsepower, is this the replacement motor for the 496?

I am hear that old 496 HO have 425 BHP, but new one have reall 430 HP on prop shaft.
This is much more than 5 HP if it is true.
sinus is offline  
Reply
Old 02-20-2011 | 03:02 PM
  #10  
Dave M's Avatar
Gold Member
Veteran: Navy
25 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,664
Likes: 140
From: Hollywood, MD, USA
Default

Originally Posted by sinus
I am hear that old 496 HO have 425 BHP, but new one have reall 430 HP on prop shaft.
This is much more than 5 HP if it is true.
Pretty sure all Merc motors have been rated at propshaft HP for quite a while now.

Is the CC required now? If you have a new boat built that is equiped with a CC are you required to always have one? Not that it would be easy for anyone to check up on you.
Dave M is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.