Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
TRS vs BRAVO >

TRS vs BRAVO

Notices

TRS vs BRAVO

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-29-2012 | 02:55 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Lake Ozark, MO
Default TRS vs BRAVO

I have a 79' Scarab with TRS drives thinking maybe going to BRAVO drives. What are the PROs and CONs of the switch??
BadBoy is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 03:03 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 4
From: PA/MD
Default

Pros:

Better hydrodynamics
no transmission to worry about
a little more power handling ability
less weight
more parts availability


Cons:

Cost
engines need moved or long drive shafts added to bravos
Baja226sport is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 03:04 PM
  #3  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 952
Likes: 83
From: East Greenwich, RI
Default

All kinds on info on this topic in threads.... Here's a search of TRS and Bravo in the titles:

Search Results
242LS is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 04:17 PM
  #4  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Dighton MA
Default

Konrads are on sale
soggy bottom is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 04:28 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 560
Likes: 1
Default

Bravos are not considered as strong as TRS thats what most people agree on. I personally dont see any point in changing to a bravo its a sideways trade that costs a lot and is a lot of work.

Of course there are reasons people like the bravo's... they are easier to work on if you ask me because if you blow a tranny with TRS the motor has to come out. Bravos will gain you some speed from what i hear and also there will be no power lost because of the transmission not being 100% efficient.

Changing to bravo would be a good idea if you are updating your whole boat.. example if you put a new transom in then you should go ahead and do it because the TRS is outdated and while its not hard to get parts now in 10 years it probably will be.
sparky24 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 04:37 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 160
From: central IL
Default

Originally Posted by BadBoy
I have a 79' Scarab with TRS drives thinking maybe going to BRAVO drives. What are the PROs and CONs of the switch??
Just curious... You didn't happen to buy your boat up by Chicago did you?

Originally Posted by catalyst.
Bravos are not considered as strong as TRS thats what most people agree on. I personally dont see any point in changing to a bravo its a sideways trade that costs a lot and is a lot of work.

Of course there are reasons people like the bravo's... they are easier to work on if you ask me because if you blow a tranny with TRS the motor has to come out. Bravos will gain you some speed from what i hear and also there will be no power lost because of the transmission not being 100% efficient.

Changing to bravo would be a good idea if you are updating your whole boat.. example if you put a new transom in then you should go ahead and do it because the TRS is outdated and while its not hard to get parts now in 10 years it probably will be.
I agree 100%
Plowtownmissile is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 04:45 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 4
From: PA/MD
Default

Originally Posted by catalyst.
Bravos are not considered as strong as TRS.
Most everyone I have talked to on the subject says TRS are not good over 400hp...??? Is this not correct?

Just wondering.
Baja226sport is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 04:49 PM
  #8  
cigrocket's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 173
From: Endicott, NY
Default

I would not say that Bravo's are stronger. Especially on an older hull that is heavy. I don't think you would see considerable changes in speed. You are also talking about a big project. Transom, engine movement. Not to mention how are the ride characteristics going to change in the boat. That boat was designed to have the weight and balance of the transmissions in the back. You can still pick up spare TRS's pretty cheep and unless you have 600+ HP they are pretty much bullet proof. Plus they shift so much nicer then bravo's. I am sure others will chime in, but a 1000 threads on this same topic exist. Good luck
cigrocket is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 04:51 PM
  #9  
cigrocket's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 173
From: Endicott, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Baja226sport
Most everyone I have talked to on the subject says TRS are not good over 400hp...??? Is this not correct?

Just wondering.
Not true. I ran 675HP for 100 hours on TRS. Just changed the oil and that was on a heavy cigarette mistress. I then converted the boat to Konrads.
cigrocket is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 05:18 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 4
From: PA/MD
Default

Hmmm....I did not realize. I actually DIDN'T buy a really, really nice fountiain 10 meter a few years back just because of the TRS set up.

The broker on the boat told me that the power in it (about 500 a side) was to much for those drives.
Baja226sport is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.