Less pitch with extension boxes?
#1
My boat, stock, spun labbed 26p Bravo1's on -1" lowers, 1.50:1 ratio to 72-73 mph @ 5200rpm. I now have 28p Bravo 1's on -3" lowers with neutral Imco boxes 1.5:1 ratio.
The motors have aluminum heads by Edelbrock & the cam Tyler Crockett supplied for his 454/502 Mag MPI upgrade package.
When I had my Whipples I could spin the same 28's to 5300+ @ 94 mph on 1.34 gears, same boxes & drives I have currently.
I was expecting 5500 rpm with the gear change and Whipple removal. I can only obtain ~4900/4950 rpm & 74 mph.
It just doesn't seem like I should be spinning the same 26p wheels I had back in stock form with an estimated 100 additional hp I currently have.
What am I missing here?
The motors have aluminum heads by Edelbrock & the cam Tyler Crockett supplied for his 454/502 Mag MPI upgrade package.
When I had my Whipples I could spin the same 28's to 5300+ @ 94 mph on 1.34 gears, same boxes & drives I have currently.
I was expecting 5500 rpm with the gear change and Whipple removal. I can only obtain ~4900/4950 rpm & 74 mph.
It just doesn't seem like I should be spinning the same 26p wheels I had back in stock form with an estimated 100 additional hp I currently have.
What am I missing here?
#3
Okay so I do not see a problem. Do the math.
RPM X Ratio X Pitch X 0.0009496 = MPH (no slip)
4900 X 0.666=3263.4
3263.4 X 26=84848.4
84848.4 X 0.0009496=80.57204
80.57 - 8% slip = 74.12 MPH
So if you speedometer is correct at 74 MPH you are at 8% slip.
I do not see a problem unless you are not in the designed operating WOT range for your engine.
RPM X Ratio X Pitch X 0.0009496 = MPH (no slip)
4900 X 0.666=3263.4
3263.4 X 26=84848.4
84848.4 X 0.0009496=80.57204
80.57 - 8% slip = 74.12 MPH
So if you speedometer is correct at 74 MPH you are at 8% slip.
I do not see a problem unless you are not in the designed operating WOT range for your engine.
#5
Just curious, why did you pull the whipples?
#6
Your prop slip is obviously less than before and its pulled your motors out of the cams power range, I have fought the same problem when I run my boat with blower belt off. You get spoiled having a flat torque curve that goes on forever with a blower and its harder to prop for N/A, we just forget that over time, Smitty
#7
Jason,
We'll talk tomorrow AM.
B
We'll talk tomorrow AM.
B
__________________
Brett Anderson / BBLADES Professional Propellers
920-295-4435 http://www.bblades.com/
[email protected]
Brett Anderson / BBLADES Professional Propellers
920-295-4435 http://www.bblades.com/
[email protected]
#9
Yours seems pretty straight fwd to me unless you have a weird tuning glitch. You made hp at 5600 or so, your running a un-labbed prop and are 600 or so rpms below the power band if I remember right, you really need to try a labbed prop that gets your rpm's right where they need to be, Smitty
#10
Registered
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Yours seems pretty straight fwd to me unless you have a weird tuning glitch. You made hp at 5600 or so, your running a un-labbed prop and are 600 or so rpms below the power band if I remember right, you really need to try a labbed prop that gets your rpm's right where they need to be, Smitty





