Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Another Jetting post >

Another Jetting post

Notices

Another Jetting post

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-04-2012 | 09:48 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 123
From: Chicago, IL; Onekama, MI
Default Another Jetting post

I'm finally in the final stages of my engine build. I'm running HP 500 carbs and I'm wondering where I should start for jetting. Here are the basic specs of the engine-

Merc 420 bottom end
Stock 088 Heads
RPM Intake
Cam 232/237 dur .612/.578 lift

I'm guessing the power should be around 460-475 with this combo and I plan on proping it around 5500 rpms. From what I can see merc jetted the 420 and 440 engines at 84 on all 4 corners. Do you guys think this is a safe baseline or should I jet up a bit from here?

Last edited by endeavour32; 06-04-2012 at 10:14 PM.
endeavour32 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2012 | 10:11 PM
  #2  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

you didn,t say what intake manifold you are useing,if it is a single plane like the hp500,i would start as if it was a hp500.if you do a googel search it will tell you how merc jetted them,they were staggered.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2012 | 10:14 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 123
From: Chicago, IL; Onekama, MI
Default

Its listed Mike, I'm using the Edelbrock RPM intake. The hp 500's are different in each corner and I'm afriad if I run it as is with the dual plane I'll run lean.
endeavour32 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2012 | 10:21 PM
  #4  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

yep,i missed it,with the dual plane manifold,id forget the stagger,i think a safe place to start,78 in primary 84 secondary with a 6.5 power valve,what are you running for exhaust?
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2012 | 10:23 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 123
From: Chicago, IL; Onekama, MI
Default

I'm running Gils with the newer HP500 tails.
endeavour32 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2012 | 10:36 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
Default

Last summer I built a similar mill - same heads, intake and carb, but I am swinging a 4.25 inch stroke for a 489, and my cam is a bit milder - 221 / 232 and .575 / .578 and 114* LSA. I am also running Lightnings instead of Gil manifolds. I started with 80's on the primary and 88's on the secondaries, and a 6.5 PV. It seems to be idling on the rich side. I didn't really get past 10 hours on it last year, so have not had a chance to dial it in yet. Just set the base timing and let it rip, without really running it hard up to this point. I had another thread out here about this time last year. I guess I have a summer of plug readings and prop testing ahead of me.
Budman II is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-2012 | 11:26 PM
  #7  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,232
Likes: 2,482
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

The Hp 500 carbs do not have powervalves in the secondaries. You will have to jet the secondaries about 8-10 sizes higher than the primaries to compensate for no secondary PV. I would start with 80 fronts and 90 rears.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-2012 | 07:32 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 123
From: Chicago, IL; Onekama, MI
Default

I found crazy horses old post on his 330 on roids engine. That engine is almost a the same as mine except his has a touch bigger cam (234/244) and it's flat tappet and mine is roller. He was running a holley 800 and dyno tuned it to 75 pri., 89 sec. jets. Would there be a big difference in getting from a 800 to the 830 used in the HP 500's?
endeavour32 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-2012 | 07:40 AM
  #9  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by endeavour32
I found crazy horses old post on his 330 on roids engine. That engine is almost a the same as mine except his has a touch bigger cam (234/244) and it's flat tappet and mine is roller. He was running a holley 800 and dyno tuned it to 75 pri., 89 sec. jets. Would there be a big difference in getting from a 800 to the 830 used in the HP 500's?
The HP500's used Holley 800 cfm carbs. I believe the 830 is actually the one that uses annular boosters, and is (I think) an 800 center section with a 750 base plate, or vice versa. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what I recall reading.
Budman II is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-2012 | 08:09 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 123
From: Chicago, IL; Onekama, MI
Default

I'm not sure either- but I know I've read over and over on here that he hp 500 carb is actually 830 and not 800. Does anyone know for sure?
endeavour32 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.