91 32 fever 67.7 gps with 5 guys and heavy on fuel, stock power
#1
Thread Starter
Pirate of the Chesapeake
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
From: North Point Creek, Md.
91 32 fever 67.7 gps with 5 guys and heavy on fuel, stock power
Finally splashed the boat. Engines are STOCK, down to the risers and exhaust, front water pumps, 340 hp turning out ,3 bladed mirage's 25 pitch. Just thought I would share( yes I know it is not a rocket ship but wasn't really expecting this with the weight on board), the boat came to plane in no time. Heard horror stories on these not planning off, not a issue at all, jumped rite up, even with 5 guys on board. Might get 70 out of it light on fuel with 2 or 3 of us. Going to look for some 26's as these spun to 5k no problem. Just thought I would share. Boat is 91 non stepped boat with 1.5-1 bravo's. 70+ should be easy with a re-prop.
John jr
John jr
Last edited by Fenderjack; 08-20-2012 at 07:04 PM.
#3
Thread Starter
Pirate of the Chesapeake
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
From: North Point Creek, Md.
Thanks man. Just these 2 of it in the water so far. We literally fired the engines yesterday LOL. Have a set of 555 darts we were going to put in here, but picked up a old 10 meter, that should run a little faster then this hull. So we picked these, fig it will be good and reliable with stockers. As for fuel, I am not sure, but I think the tank is 80 gallon or so. I know the boat had 60 gallon in it.
John jr
John jr
Last edited by Fenderjack; 08-20-2012 at 08:19 PM.
#4
Registered

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,307
Likes: 40
From: lockport ny
my friend just picked up a 92 32 502/415. it came w/ 25 3 blades on it. we put bravo 26 4 blades on it he was only able to turn it 4600 rpm. let me know how you make out with yours. being less power. i dont think my friend was running his boat to its potential. nice looking ride!!
#6
Thread Starter
Pirate of the Chesapeake
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
From: North Point Creek, Md.
He should have been able to spin the 25's to 5k no problem. I think the 26's 4 blades sounds about right. 1 more blade is ruffly a 200 rmp drop, along with a inch of pitch is about 200. Not sure how soon i will up to a 26, but again these things spun to 5k no problem. I think these blue water mercs are ruffly 340 hp. And thanks for the comp. i can't wait to get our 33 running with 7xx hp a side. I was very impressed with the ride on this 32 as it is the first 32 i have rode in. Everything just felt rite. drives were out, with no tab at all. Might have been able to squeeze a little more out but..
John jr
John jr
#7
Thread Starter
Pirate of the Chesapeake
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
From: North Point Creek, Md.
John jr
#8
Registered
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 13
From: Hamilton, Ohio
My boat finally broke the 70mph mark 71.3 on the 12th for my birthday, I have some dinged up props & a bad bushing on the bell of 1 of the drives(has some play). New port motor seems to be completely broke in & finally got some cooler air that day right before dark!! Was really surprised to see that #
Glen FWIW I have put roughly 113-115 gallons in @ once on mine so I'd say either 120-130 gallon is the tank!! Boat always seems to take more fuel & easier if you have the a** sitting a Lil low like they do in the water...
Glen FWIW I have put roughly 113-115 gallons in @ once on mine so I'd say either 120-130 gallon is the tank!! Boat always seems to take more fuel & easier if you have the a** sitting a Lil low like they do in the water...
#10
Registered

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,346
Likes: 1,851
From: Merritt Island, FL
I was looking over my documentation and notes from fountain and it said mine had a 115 gallon tank. I thought before 130 but not from these notes.
Also needs to be setting in the water to get close to being able to fill it.
I like how the older 32's vents are on the side and not back, only reason I can figure they changed it was maybe worried about pulling the fumes right back in?
Also needs to be setting in the water to get close to being able to fill it.
I like how the older 32's vents are on the side and not back, only reason I can figure they changed it was maybe worried about pulling the fumes right back in?


