Notices

sbc exhaust/cam upgrades

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-23-2013 | 12:21 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default sbc exhaust/cam upgrades

Hey guys,

So after a disappointing summer I am tearing into my sbc's again. Had a gimbal bearing go bad, and pregnant wife so, the water time was almost non existant.

I have sbc's with RHS 180runner 64cc cumbustion chamber aluminum heads, 1.5 full roller rockers, edelbrock rpm air gap intakes and edelbrock 1410 carbs, DUI ignition. I was not to happy with the cams that I put in so I am looking to do the retro roller conversion. Didnt do it last time as I kept factory exhaust($$$ issue).

I am looking at a cam specd as follows:
278/ 286 duration

225/ 233 duration@050

.525 /.530 lift with 1.5 rockers

110 LSA

If you guys think I can get a little more agressive with the cam let me know!

My exhaust choices are limited as I need a six inch riser spacer to work with the thru hull set up(no way around it), also tall rocker covers. I have been looking at the IMCO Powerflow, Stainless Marine and HI-TEK. I looked at Lightning, but he said he does not offer anything taller then factory mercruiser. That sux because I really like the lightnings.
I talked the owner of HI-TEK, and he will give me a great deal, basically matching the cost of the IMCO's or Stainless. The Hi_Teks have a cool design and internally are similar to CMI's. I really like the fact that tere are NO gaskets!

Both IMCO and Stainless have great reps and proven performance and I wont have reversion worries. So any thoughts are appreciated.

Last edited by MEANGREEN231; 01-23-2013 at 12:23 PM.
MEANGREEN231 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-24-2013 | 07:26 AM
  #2  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Default

What is the static / dynamic compression ratio of your combo now and what weren't you happy about with the performance of the existing cam?
bwiencek is offline  
Reply
Old 01-24-2013 | 01:42 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 8
From: Ocala, Fl
Default

If you are happy with the heads I suggest moving to a pair of Quick Fuel 750 Double Pumpers to make consistent power with that Cam.

I think the Edelbrock will starve your overall throttle response and starve those motors in the mid range while you are accelerating up and down between 3000 and 4500...you really do need that active secondary to fill in the voids left by a vacuum secondary carb. I'm talking about real world "Driving the Boat" feel...not just Dyno numbers.
sprink58 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-24-2013 | 02:15 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by bwiencek
What is the static / dynamic compression ratio of your combo now and what weren't you happy about with the performance of the existing cam?
Best calculation I have is approx 10.3 to 1 CR. the motors just feel weak, the current cams are single pattern 465lift 114 lsa flat tappet. I know the cam is the weak spot but I wanted to stay safe running factory manifolds/risers. I know stepping up to roller is a good gain, plus the added lift/duration and the 110 CL will help out big time in the power department. Plus I would like to squeak a few hundred more rpms out of the motors when going all out. Right now 5200 is tops, 54-5600 would be great.
MEANGREEN231 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-24-2013 | 06:37 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, Fl.
Default

I agree with Sprink, that being said, I would start with the 750 dbl pumpers first. May be a tad much for that cam, but you would probably see them come alive.
I only owned one Edelbrock carb, and I felt the same way you do now!
They're good for daily drivers, thats about it for me.
CC230 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-27-2013 | 06:13 AM
  #6  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 153
From: Tygart Lake, WV
Default

I agree on upgrading to a 750 DP carb design of your choice over the Edelbrock. I ran a 355ci in summer 07. Cam was a 226/230 .528/.511 112+4 hyd roller, AFR 190 heads, RPM airgap, HP 750, GLM alum manifolds, Imco performance risers with 16" extensions to keep it from reverting water at idle. It ran great and pulled hard to 5700-5800rpms. Idled N @ 750-800rpms. Boat ran low 70's GPS all day with that combo.

With whatever exhaust choice you choose, go with the longest risers you can get to avoid reverting water.
Ryan00TJ is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-2013 | 10:49 PM
  #7  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 143
Default

Running a 377 stroker with a Crower 221/230 & .525/.545 on a 114 LSA hyd roller and 1.5 rockers with a Merc EFI MP system. GLM exhaust with stock Merc stainless risers to thru-hull and no reversion noted to date.
Trash is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2013 | 10:57 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Looks like I am going with the imco powerflows, for exhaust. I am still undecided on the cam though, they can make or break a motor.
MEANGREEN231 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2013 | 11:55 AM
  #9  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 143
Default

I'm a big fan of hyd roller cams. I think it would go well with what you intend to do. LSAs of 112-114 in the higher duration cams can help mitigate reversion issues in most cases.
Trash is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2013 | 01:28 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 1
Default

Been running a set of polished Imco powerflows on my small block for a decade.

You will like them. The long riser is a good idea.

I run a pretty hot cammed 406 that idles pretty choppy and have never had a reversion issue.

How many cubic inches do you have?


Uncle Dave
Uncle Dave is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.