Which head gasket for a 4.280 bore?
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
Looking at head gaskets for my 489 build - it has a .030 overbore on the 4.250 bore, for 4.280 total. Cometic makes two gaskets for this application in the .027 thickness - c5337-027 has an advertised bore of 4.337", and c5817-027 has 4.320. Which one is correct for my application?
Thanks!
Thanks!
#3
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
Thanks Mike - just wanted to be sure there wouldn't be any chance of having any part of the gasket hanging into the cylinder with the smaller one. I guess the smaller displaced volume would help compression a tiny bit.
#5
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
IIRC, they are about .008 in the hole. Flat top Mahle forged slugs with a 3cc valve relief, 088 heads with 118 cc chambers, 4.280 bore and 4.25 stroke. I think the .027 gasket will get me up to around 8.7 CR. That is the main reason I want to run the .027 cometic. That would also give me about .035 quench.
#7
Me too. Just make sure someone did not go ape**** with the chamfer at the top of the bore. I've seen some pretty large chamfers cut in to ease piston install.
Also I'd probably go with .030 thick cometic, .035 quench is getting a little snug. CR would go to 8.70 from 8.74 with the .027 vs .030 using the 4.32 bore gasket. Any reason why you are going so low on CR? Maybe a blower app?
Also I'd probably go with .030 thick cometic, .035 quench is getting a little snug. CR would go to 8.70 from 8.74 with the .027 vs .030 using the 4.32 bore gasket. Any reason why you are going so low on CR? Maybe a blower app?
Last edited by blue thunder; 01-24-2013 at 09:09 AM.
#8
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
Me too. Just make sure someone did not go ape**** with the chamfer at the top of the bore. I've seen some pretty large chamfers cut in to ease piston install.
Also I'd probably go with .030 thick cometic, .035 quench is getting a little snug. CR would go to 8.70 from 8.74 with the .027 vs .030 using the 4.32 bore gasket. Any reason why you are going so low on CR? Maybe a blower app?
Also I'd probably go with .030 thick cometic, .035 quench is getting a little snug. CR would go to 8.70 from 8.74 with the .027 vs .030 using the 4.32 bore gasket. Any reason why you are going so low on CR? Maybe a blower app?
Is the tight quench a concern for piston / head contact, or something else? Engine will be limited to 5200 or so RPM. I thought the ideal quench was around .035 or so.
#9
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
Me too. Just make sure someone did not go ape**** with the chamfer at the top of the bore. I've seen some pretty large chamfers cut in to ease piston install.
Also I'd probably go with .030 thick cometic, .035 quench is getting a little snug. CR would go to 8.70 from 8.74 with the .027 vs .030 using the 4.32 bore gasket. Any reason why you are going so low on CR? Maybe a blower app?
Also I'd probably go with .030 thick cometic, .035 quench is getting a little snug. CR would go to 8.70 from 8.74 with the .027 vs .030 using the 4.32 bore gasket. Any reason why you are going so low on CR? Maybe a blower app?
#10
That is just the way the CR ended up with the flat top pistons. They came with the stroker kit - other choice in pistons would have taken the CR up too high. I didn't want to mill a ton of material off the block or heads because then you get into issues with milling intakes, etc. Would have loved to end up around 9:1, but just not happening.
Is the tight quench a concern for piston / head contact, or something else? Engine will be limited to 5200 or so RPM. I thought the ideal quench was around .035 or so.
Is the tight quench a concern for piston / head contact, or something else? Engine will be limited to 5200 or so RPM. I thought the ideal quench was around .035 or so.
Also what is the IVC angle on the cam you plan to run?
Last edited by blue thunder; 01-24-2013 at 12:17 PM.




