311 formula vs 31 scarab excel....
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 2
From: St.Louis MO
So looking to upgrade..Have two options im looking at..one is a 1988 311 formula with 502s..other is a 1990 scarab excel with 454s..
Formula is more expensive by about 8k...
Give me some input here...
Upgrading from a 70 mph 24 outlaw that was built to run LOTO..
Formula is more expensive by about 8k...
Give me some input here...
Upgrading from a 70 mph 24 outlaw that was built to run LOTO..
#2
Registered

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,998
Likes: 127
From: Lees Summit ~ LOTO 10MM
Engine hours? Drives? Steering? Those all would be big determining factors. I like the fact of the 8.2 blocks in the formula for future upgrades. Visually though I like the looks of the 31 excel
#3
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 2
From: St.Louis MO
Formula..rebuilt motors they claim only 25hs..
Excel..one motor brand new only break in time...other motor unknown hrs..
Both have bravos, both have just tie-bars..not hydro..
Not really looking to upgrade anything on the motors anytime soon..been there done that with older boats..just looking to get in the boat and go now..wrenching time isn't as much fun as it use to be..
Excel..one motor brand new only break in time...other motor unknown hrs..
Both have bravos, both have just tie-bars..not hydro..
Not really looking to upgrade anything on the motors anytime soon..been there done that with older boats..just looking to get in the boat and go now..wrenching time isn't as much fun as it use to be..
#6
Registered

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 191
Formula..rebuilt motors they claim only 25hs..
Excel..one motor brand new only break in time...other motor unknown hrs..
Both have bravos, both have just tie-bars..not hydro..
Not really looking to upgrade anything on the motors anytime soon..been there done that with older boats..just looking to get in the boat and go now..wrenching time isn't as much fun as it use to be..
Excel..one motor brand new only break in time...other motor unknown hrs..
Both have bravos, both have just tie-bars..not hydro..
Not really looking to upgrade anything on the motors anytime soon..been there done that with older boats..just looking to get in the boat and go now..wrenching time isn't as much fun as it use to be..
Look at the Excel for quality of build especially at the straightness (or lack of) down the outside of the hull then look at the FORMULA, I'll bet money the Formula is much straighter and overall a much more quality boat (inside and out). What no receipts for the rebuild of the Formula motors or reference from builder?
At the Houston boat show they parked the only Formula next to a comp Scarrab, the Formula put the glasswork on the Scarrab to absolute shame.
Way too many variables for comparison without further details.
Good luck with your purchase whatever you decide.
#7
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 2
From: St.Louis MO
No its not listed right now..if interested its a 88 240..completely redone..extra stringers..extra bulk heads..all foam core..no wood..x raised 4 inches..top cap glasses to bottom..502..thats just a quick detail run down if interested pm me...
#8
Formula..rebuilt motors they claim only 25hs..
Excel..one motor brand new only break in time...other motor unknown hrs..
Both have bravos, both have just tie-bars..not hydro..
Not really looking to upgrade anything on the motors anytime soon..been there done that with older boats..just looking to get in the boat and go now..wrenching time isn't as much fun as it use to be..
Excel..one motor brand new only break in time...other motor unknown hrs..
Both have bravos, both have just tie-bars..not hydro..
Not really looking to upgrade anything on the motors anytime soon..been there done that with older boats..just looking to get in the boat and go now..wrenching time isn't as much fun as it use to be..
My.02 25+ yr. old boat sounds like a money pit to me. I'd look for a newer, more efficient hull.




