Is there a better roller lifter than gm for .....?
#1
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 441
Likes: 71
From: KCMO
Appx. 140# seat pressure / appx. 370 spring rate. The better Morels require 150# minimum on the seat IIRC. I'm wanting to keep a 509 build at no more than 500hp for several reasons; 1- I don't want ANY drive concerns and I know the drive will be hammered on. 2- I want to retain the silent choice. 3- Safety (a few family members will be allowed to use it), its a pretty speedy hull already; a somewhat light 24' vented cat hull. I was thinking of getting a single pattern cam cut with a symmetrical, somewhat low intensity lobe. Backing off on the duration for silent choice, I'm just afraid that the torque will just hit too fast and hard for the drive with a more modern, higher lift lobe that's on the short side duration wise.(I already have upgraded heads with higher compression and sub 300cc intakes) So are the GM lifters the best thing going for a mild cam?
#2
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 8
From: bel air, md
There is a new lifter out that sounds very promising. Bob M. @ Marine Kinetics has all the specs on the new lifter. From what I'm told it stands up against other lifters very well.
Last edited by Black Baja; 04-03-2015 at 04:32 PM.
#3
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 441
Likes: 71
From: KCMO
And this will work good with lower spring pressures? Thanks for the reply. I probably can't reply back until Monday.
#5
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 3,668
From: On A Dirt Floor
Lower spring psi's typically don't matter. It's a matter of how high of spring psi's (+lobe intensity/jerk/acceleration/and other lobe things I don't have a total handle on) the lifter can deal with.
#6
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
The morels seemed to have a good reputation for a while . the machine shop I use has used Johnson lifters for some time now with good results as well.
What about the Johnsons did they do that left the morels "in the dust"? When did Johnson develop this new lifter ?
I've been running morels for a few years now because I was told they were the best here on oso. I did have one collapse on me, but was told it was more than likely a fluke.
I don't know about the Johnsons, but morels 5045 called for higher spring pressures than the 4603's. I am on the light side of spring pressure with a 4603 lifter, well, actually what john Callie's recommends for them , with 165/450ish . pulled to 6300 on the dyno, and been run around 5700-5900 in the boat , never any signs of valve float .
What about the Johnsons did they do that left the morels "in the dust"? When did Johnson develop this new lifter ?
I've been running morels for a few years now because I was told they were the best here on oso. I did have one collapse on me, but was told it was more than likely a fluke.
I don't know about the Johnsons, but morels 5045 called for higher spring pressures than the 4603's. I am on the light side of spring pressure with a 4603 lifter, well, actually what john Callie's recommends for them , with 165/450ish . pulled to 6300 on the dyno, and been run around 5700-5900 in the boat , never any signs of valve float .
#7
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 441
Likes: 71
From: KCMO
I don't know about the Johnsons, but morels 5045 called for higher spring pressures than the 4603's. I am on the light side of spring pressure with a 4603 lifter, well, actually what john Callie's recommends for them , with 165/450ish . pulled to 6300 on the dyno, and been run around 5700-5900 in the boat , never any signs of valve float .
#10
LL
The force, or spring rate, that’s required for your valve train is a byproduct a very simple equation.
F= M*A
At sub 5200 RPM, on a lobe with a modest acceleration derivative that element is in check.
The mass of the BBC valves on both sides are some of the highest values found in engine design, particularly if you utilize an Inconel exhaust valve. The rate of your spring should ideally be ~ 420-440 to prevent premature spring fatigue and seat erosion at those mass levels.
If, for example, you utilize an Isky 8005 Plus, with a rate of 433#/in, set at
1.850” your seat force will come in at 151 LBS, with an open force of 411 Lbs. at .600” lift at the valve. That would allow you to utilize the assets your current Morels bring to the table while making for a very stable package.
Bob
The force, or spring rate, that’s required for your valve train is a byproduct a very simple equation.
F= M*A
At sub 5200 RPM, on a lobe with a modest acceleration derivative that element is in check.
The mass of the BBC valves on both sides are some of the highest values found in engine design, particularly if you utilize an Inconel exhaust valve. The rate of your spring should ideally be ~ 420-440 to prevent premature spring fatigue and seat erosion at those mass levels.
If, for example, you utilize an Isky 8005 Plus, with a rate of 433#/in, set at
1.850” your seat force will come in at 151 LBS, with an open force of 411 Lbs. at .600” lift at the valve. That would allow you to utilize the assets your current Morels bring to the table while making for a very stable package.
Bob



