Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Do It Yourself, Boating on a Budget
454 engine rebuld questions- stock 7/16 rods or aftermarket >

454 engine rebuld questions- stock 7/16 rods or aftermarket

Notices

454 engine rebuld questions- stock 7/16 rods or aftermarket

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-09-2015 | 10:09 AM
  #1  
phughes69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 169
From: St. Clair Shores, MI
Default 454 engine rebuld questions- stock 7/16 rods or aftermarket

I rebuilt my starboard engine 2 years ago and I am getting ready to do my port one now. When I redid the starboard engine, I used L2453F speedpro forged pressed pin dished pistons and I want to use these same pistons to keep the compression ratios in the motors the same. I wanted low compression for the turbos. I had the stock rods (LS6) honed and new ARP rod bolts and I had the crank ground .10.

This is not a high HP high revving engine. I use a flat tappet turbo spec cam in it and 188 heads on it. My rpm are about 5400-5600 and I estimate my HP to be about 600-to 750 (depending on how much boost I want)
The long blocks are 370 HP 1980 Mark IV's (LS6 spec forged crank, 7/16 forged rods, rectangular iron heads)

Now my question is is it worth it to have the stock rods honed and new rod bolts on the port engine or is it better the get a new set from summit. A new set from summit is: Scat I beam 7/16 bolts- $271 or Eagle SIR I-Beam- $299.
phughes69 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2015 | 10:55 AM
  #2  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

I'd go with the new rods bud. My personal opinion is to go with new H beam style rods from eagle, scat, etc, over the I beams. They aren't much more money.

You may be able to get 100 bucks out of your old rods on fleabay if in good shape.

Your turbo engines are cool old school man !
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2015 | 10:56 AM
  #3  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Post some pics of those things
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2015 | 11:02 AM
  #4  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,167
From: taxachusetts
Default

I'd go w/ new rods and have the whole thing balanced.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2015 | 10:13 PM
  #5  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

mercury marine went to an h beam rod in the hp500&525 .you can buy a set of scat or eagle h beam rods with 8740 bolts for not much more than it cost to rebuild the gm rods with new arp bolts and they are way stronger than the gm rods.as mentioned earlier get the assembly balanced.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2015 | 10:18 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 2
From: dfw texas
Default

Normally i would vote 7/16 for most 5500 rpm but when you almost double the power with a turbo upgrade ,and then post pics
it doesnt take much for gm to change the balance for cranks with the same casting number in a stock app so dont skimp there either
airjunky is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 04:51 PM
  #7  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

I have mixed feelings on this however feel either way you'd be fine assuming you'd have your machine shop ck out your rods and resize if necessary. I knew an old time engine builder who always preferred to reuse rods. Only of course after being thourgherly checked out mic,hone,resize. His reasoning was they were done being stretched etc. He had an unfortunate experience early on with a new set with a defective one that ultimately grenaded the engine in a sbc.

Not saying to use that advice for determining your decision however just thought I'd throw it out there. It always kinda of made since. Once again I'm not trying to say it's a better route to go. It's simply sharing an experience that was shared with me many many years ago. In regards to the hp and torque I've run the GM rods up to 800 hp with no issues what so ever. That was well balanced and under 6,500 rpm.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-2015 | 06:47 PM
  #8  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

The GM 7/16 rods were a good rod, for their day. However. By the time you magnuflux them, resize them, new bolts, ( I wouldnt reuse 30 year old bolts in a turbo marine engine) maybe bush them, shotpeen, etc, you'll still have an old 4130 Forging, with thru bolts rather than cap screws, which have seen millions of cycles, that simply arent' as capable/strong as a modern 4340 Forging already setup for floating pins, with good bolts, for the same or similar cost.

Scat and I think eagle, make an I beam rod, with or without capscrew style bolts, and 5140 or 4340 forging. If you are going that route, I'd spend the couple extra dollars, for the 4340 capscrew rod.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.