Any drive blueprint guys on hear?
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: Punta Gorda
I was wondering if anyone has done any testing on sharpening the leading edge of a Imco skeg?
I have shortened a few and sharpened them but never tested back to back?
I have shortened a few and sharpened them but never tested back to back?
#2
__________________
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )
#3
Banned
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 45
From: Ft. Worth TX
call IMCO I know they claim better handling with the skeg extending it forward more to front of the bullet .
Pic below what I am talking about
http://www.imcomarine.com/cal_store/...lete-1131.html
Pic below what I am talking about
http://www.imcomarine.com/cal_store/...lete-1131.html
#4
Registered
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,825
Likes: 612
From: Clarkston, Michigan
BUP, that picture is interesting. Are all Imco lowers being made like that now?
I did a lot of work on mine. Besides sharpening the leading edge and thinning areas I did a lot of experimenting with the water inlet size and location to get the pressure down where I wanted it and to greatly reduce the cavitation burn behind the intake which seems to be very common. My water inlet has since been welded up at the front to make it even smaller. Cav burn is now only a small line and pressure is right where it should be without having to run a relief valve but I saw no noticable speed increase.

The inlet now: You can see where it was welded up and where the deep cav burn was also filled in.
I did a lot of work on mine. Besides sharpening the leading edge and thinning areas I did a lot of experimenting with the water inlet size and location to get the pressure down where I wanted it and to greatly reduce the cavitation burn behind the intake which seems to be very common. My water inlet has since been welded up at the front to make it even smaller. Cav burn is now only a small line and pressure is right where it should be without having to run a relief valve but I saw no noticable speed increase.

The inlet now: You can see where it was welded up and where the deep cav burn was also filled in.
Last edited by thirdchildhood; 06-02-2015 at 07:13 AM.
#5
BUP, that picture is interesting. Are all Imco lowers being made like that now?
I did a lot of work on mine. Besides sharpening the leading edge and thinning areas I did a lot of experimenting with the water inlet size and location to get the pressure down where I wanted it and to greatly reduce the cavitation burn behind the intake which seems to be very common. My water inlet has since been welded up at the front to make it even smaller. Cav burn is now only a small line and pressure is right where it should be without having to run a relief valve but I saw no noticable speed increase.

The inlet now: You can see where it was welded up and where the deep cav burn was also filled in.

I did a lot of work on mine. Besides sharpening the leading edge and thinning areas I did a lot of experimenting with the water inlet size and location to get the pressure down where I wanted it and to greatly reduce the cavitation burn behind the intake which seems to be very common. My water inlet has since been welded up at the front to make it even smaller. Cav burn is now only a small line and pressure is right where it should be without having to run a relief valve but I saw no noticable speed increase.

The inlet now: You can see where it was welded up and where the deep cav burn was also filled in.

__________________
Everything is for sale @ a certain $$
Everything is for sale @ a certain $$
#6
Registered
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,825
Likes: 612
From: Clarkston, Michigan





