Notices

Melling 10778 or 10778C

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-23-2015 | 09:40 AM
  #1  
phughes69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,127
Likes: 169
From: St. Clair Shores, MI
Default Melling 10778 or 10778C

I'm putting a Melling oil pump in my motor and in discussing it with the tech guy from Melling her recommended not to use the 10778C pump. He says the anticavitation groves will make the oil pressure too low at idle. I did tell him that this engine will spin up about 5400-5600 and it is in a twin turbo offshore boat. Thoughts?????
phughes69 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-2015 | 10:12 AM
  #2  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

use the 10778.the tech was correct,the 10778c is not recommended for marine use.i really like the 10778 pump.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-2015 | 10:44 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 15
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by mike tkach
use the 10778.the tech was correct,the 10778c is not recommended for marine use.i really like the 10778 pump.
+1
adk61 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-2015 | 01:20 PM
  #4  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 83
Likes: 11
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Default

I ran the 10778C for 350-400 hrs, and just took my engines apart for refresh this spring. The bearings still looked new, as did pretty much everything else. Except for some carbon on the pistons and weak valve springs. I ran 40wt synthetic in it and always had great oil pressure when cold starting (50-60 psi) and anything above 1200-5600 rpm when hot (35-60 psi), but once it was warmed up and idling I had about 8-12 psi at 800rpm in gear. It drove me nuts so I am NOT going back with the "c" and chose the regular 10778 for this rebuild. Hope that helps answer your question.
whodathought38SS is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-2015 | 02:06 PM
  #5  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 996
Likes: 189
From: Red Oak, Texas
Default

I ran the C for awhile, results above are the same as mine, except sometimes (may have been the sender) it looked like a couple of pounds at idle warm.
CDShack is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-2015 | 09:48 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,570
Likes: 127
From: Pasadena, MD
Default

I use the C in 3 motors but never see under 30lbs
f_inscreenname is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-2015 | 09:56 PM
  #7  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,104
Likes: 3,692
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

Remember, 5500 rpm's is slow for an engine. We must sometimes remember most marine engines do not spin fast.
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 06-24-2015 | 07:03 AM
  #8  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 128
From: Hemlock, MI
Default

I have a C in my 548 and had 20 psi hot at idle.
Gimme Fuel is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.