Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Confused about 500 EFI valve breather plumbing >

Confused about 500 EFI valve breather plumbing

Notices

Confused about 500 EFI valve breather plumbing

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-29-2015 | 10:54 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 306
Likes: 6
From: Roanoke VA
Question Confused about 500 EFI valve breather plumbing

I'm running Merc 500EFI intake systems on my 540 stroker engines. The PCV valve is installed between the plenum and the intake manifold and I installed filtered breathers on the valve covers. I notice on the Merc parts diagram that they plumb the valve covers into 90 deg elbows and hoses that run ( I think) to the back corner of the plenum where I have my non stock fuel pressure regulator vacuum hose plumbed. If the valve cover breather holes are plumbed to a vacuum source on the plenum how can they draw air into the crankcase? If this is how they're set up, is there any downside to my just using breathers on the valve cover?
ctuck0659 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2015 | 11:40 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 706
From: Taunton Ma
Default

The valve cover breather tubes "T" together and go to the flame arrester.
Unlimited jd is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2015 | 12:44 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 306
Likes: 6
From: Roanoke VA
Default

Originally Posted by Unlimited jd
The valve cover breather tubes "T" together and go to the flame arrester.
No flame arrester, EFI
ctuck0659 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2015 | 01:05 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 706
From: Taunton Ma
Default

Ok call it what you want, air filter, breather, throttle body screen
Unlimited jd is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2015 | 07:31 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 306
Likes: 6
From: Roanoke VA
Default

Originally Posted by Unlimited jd
Ok call it what you want, air filter, breather, throttle body screen
Not trying to be argumentative but I'm pretty sure there's no hose nipple anywhere near the throttle body. The only one I recall seeing is at the rear right corner of the air plenum where I plumed in my fuel regulator vacuum hose as I mentioned.
Thanks-
ctuck0659 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2015 | 08:53 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 706
From: Taunton Ma
Default

There isn't any nipple, it just aims at it. There is a stick on wire tie holder that is stuck to the thermostat housing, and the tube is tied to it and just sits with the open end against the flame arrester
Unlimited jd is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2015 | 08:59 PM
  #7  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,347
Likes: 1,851
From: Merritt Island, FL
Default

^^^^^^ that's how mine are.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2015 | 09:03 PM
  #8  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Default

The two vale cover breather hoses T together and go the the FLAME ARRESTER, yes it is a flame arrester, you can still backfire with EFI. their is also intake vacuum line going to fule reg, and a pvc hose going to the bottom of the plenum. But to answer you question.. you could run valve cover breathers, and it would be better for the motor to not try and re-burn crank case fumes. your engine compartment might get a little dirty, but oh well
Bawana is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2015 | 09:14 PM
  #9  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 789
Likes: 2
From: Long Island n.y.
Default

Originally Posted by Bawana
The two vale cover breather hoses T together and go the the FLAME ARRESTER, yes it is a flame arrester, you can still backfire with EFI. their is also intake vacuum line going to fule reg, and a pvc hose going to the bottom of the plenum. But to answer you question.. you could run valve cover breathers, and it would be better for the motor to not try and re-burn crank case fumes. your engine compartment might get a little dirty, but oh well
i do agree with what you say but is it cost guard approved to run that way? Not that I would give a good rats arse what they think, but could this be a issue while being boarded ?
Drew555 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-29-2015 | 11:07 PM
  #10  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by Drew555
i do agree with what you say but is it cost guard approved to run that way? Not that I would give a good rats arse what they think, but could this be a issue while being boarded ?
Nope.. the 850 1075 motors don't re-burn crankcase fumes
Bawana is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.