Muscle car related vacuum advance vs piston speed
#1
Hello all.
Question about vacuum advance I've been battling for a bit. Talked to several "experts" on this matter and, like most topics, getting conflicting thoughts.
I fully understand how and why this system works and why it's benedicial in a street driven car.
My question is this:
Under highway style cruise when the vacuum advance is fully deployed, if I were to suddenly go to WOT, will the vacuum canister release the advance quickly enough to not cause detonation. In other words, does the speed of the Pistons rise faster than the advance comes down?
I want to keep the vacuum advance for obvious reasons and my car is a relatively mild non track car.
446CI Chrysler RB
Solid flat tappet cam
10.5" of vacuum at idle, in gear
3.23 rear
2800 stahl
3700 pound car
Thanks
Question about vacuum advance I've been battling for a bit. Talked to several "experts" on this matter and, like most topics, getting conflicting thoughts.
I fully understand how and why this system works and why it's benedicial in a street driven car.
My question is this:
Under highway style cruise when the vacuum advance is fully deployed, if I were to suddenly go to WOT, will the vacuum canister release the advance quickly enough to not cause detonation. In other words, does the speed of the Pistons rise faster than the advance comes down?
I want to keep the vacuum advance for obvious reasons and my car is a relatively mild non track car.
446CI Chrysler RB
Solid flat tappet cam
10.5" of vacuum at idle, in gear
3.23 rear
2800 stahl
3700 pound car
Thanks
#5
Just a guess, but assuming it's not binding at all I'd guess it's not a concern. My reasoning it that the throttle blades react instantly to the pedal and the change in vacuum should show up right away. The pistons however need to overcome their own inertia and have the added drag of the vehicle driveline to overcome. There is the added delay of the extra air / fuel mix that the carb is now able to flow to actually fill the cylinders. Make sense?
#6
I'd still think the canister and linkage would react quicker than the rest of engine for the same reasons. I did reconsider the whole argument for a different reason and delete my post while I thought about it. But you read it too quickly...
__________________
Straight bottoms and flat decks
Straight bottoms and flat decks
Last edited by bck; 01-09-2017 at 06:47 PM.
#7
My thoughts are that on a relatively light race car with a tall gear, the RPM's would increase much more rapidly than a relatively heavy street car with a lower stahl converter and a higher gear, where the diaphragm would have enough time to pull the added advance out.
#8
Registered
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 239
From: Michigan
I think a lot depends on the type of springs that are on the mechanical advance, most cars of that era had heavy (strong) springs that would hold back the mechanical portion until engine RPMs came well up, with that said they used the ported vacuum to help bridge that gap! Now over the years many distributors have been resprung with custom curve lighter springs that guys thought would help racing from light to light. if you still have the original heavy spring in there and they have not been compromised by heat and time, you will be fine with the ported vacuum, if the springs have been replaced with the lighter aftermarket springs then there could be issues with too much advance. I have in the past ran a ported car on manifold to advance the idle timing to help prevent overheating at idle until air flow begins to pass over the radiator. Another thing to consider is the carb actuation, is it a vacuum sec or 1 to 1 mechanical





