Bbc SC deck height
#1
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
This has been discussed before however what is the magic number on the piston below deck? This is debatable question and can ask 10 different people and get 7 different answers so the question is more directed toward SC builds with hands on experience. At the same time what is considered a good target quench. I have my own experience with such however on lower hp builds and mostly NA builds. 555 SC 8.5:1 comp build.
NA I'd typically be btwn 005-008 in the hole with .040 gasket with a total of .045-.048 quench. seems like many engine builders try and end up with 0 to .010 deck height to help avoid detonation. SC being a little more forgiving??? Forced induction and chambers can change things up but how much?
NA I'd typically be btwn 005-008 in the hole with .040 gasket with a total of .045-.048 quench. seems like many engine builders try and end up with 0 to .010 deck height to help avoid detonation. SC being a little more forgiving??? Forced induction and chambers can change things up but how much?
Last edited by getrdunn; 02-02-2017 at 10:11 PM.
#2
Gold Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 702
Likes: 26
From: Southern, IL.
Keep the Quench between 34-38 for less detonation, I just finished an engine that piston was .008 down in the cyl., used a .027 Cometic head gasket , I have build many engines, all NA., with Quench in this range, never had any problems.
#4
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
That's seems to be middle of the road. I wasn't sure if an sc application with more turbulence so to speak would have an affect or not. Plus the chambers are going to be reworked and opened up regardless so would more help or not? Just a thought that popped int o my head. Jim v tried steering toward flat tops but just don't see any good way to get 8:5.1 or less without some kind of other potential risk. Personally I've always liked flat tops when able to use just cause of the even combustion. May not mean chit in the real world but always made sense to me. That's only when comparing to higher dome pistons though. Almost like side loading. Anyway I'm getting off track here.
#5
Registered

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
as you know different builds will require different pistons.if i am building a pro charged deal i like more compression because the unit needs to be spun faster before it makes boost so it needs to make more power before boost.a roots or screw blower makes boost as soon as you start to open the throttle blades.the total amount of boost and the engine application needs to be be thought out before deciding on a c/r. on a pro charged 565 i built last year the c/r came in at 9.2 to 1,if i had that one to do over the c/r would be closer to 10 to 1.
#6
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Ya I'd like to have my static mid 8's + or - but I was more so wondering about the quench and the deck height. Looks like I would end up with 20 -22cc dish regardless so I'm not going to be concerned with deck height at this point.
#10
Registered

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
with a new block i almost always go .010 in the hole,that way if it needs to be resurfaced down the road for some reason you still have some metal to machine on and won,t have the piston out of the hole.


