Notices
General Boating Discussion

Raise or Hold?

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-21-2017 | 09:57 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 8
From: Southeast Michigan
Default Raise or Hold?

Video from last month, debating on raising the motor one more hole to get the anti-cav plate out of the water more. Thoughts?
Speedracer29 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-2017 | 09:57 AM
  #2  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 8
From: Southeast Michigan
Default

Video
http://youtu.be/svO-Tyo95Qs
Speedracer29 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-21-2017 | 10:10 AM
  #3  
scarabman's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 227
From: TR, NJ
Default

I will answer your question, with a question. Why wouldnt you? If it doesnt gain you anything desirable, drop it back down. You never know til you try.
scarabman is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 08:22 AM
  #4  
mrv8outboard's Avatar
coolrunning racing
25 Year Member
VIP Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 561
Likes: 4
From: cape cod
Default

Safety, steering and water pressure. The only way to know it to test. You need to maintain control at all aspects of operation. As the engine height increases the amount of usable trim decreases. Safety first!
mrv8outboard is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 08:52 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 8
From: Southeast Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by mrv8outboard
Safety, steering and water pressure. The only way to know it to test. You need to maintain control at all aspects of operation. As the engine height increases the amount of usable trim decreases. Safety first!
I think that's why I've been lazy about raising it thus far. Water pressure and steering are fine, but I almost feel like it hits the sweet spot for trim pretty quick as it sits. With the hull level on trailer, the motor comes from fully tucked in to level position in about a "5 count". On the water, I don't feel like increasing the trim much beyond that point yielded much result, but that might change with a prop swap and increased motor height.

Last edited by Speedracer29; 05-22-2017 at 09:11 AM.
Speedracer29 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 12:17 PM
  #6  
ziemer's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 5
From: St. Cloud, FL
Default

What prop are you running? Is there a nose cone on the lower? Where is the propshaft in relation to the Pad (bottom). By the looks of the video it looks like it could go at least one hole up. There's little spray off the prop until the motor becomes over trimmed. There also didn't appear to be hardly any cavitation at takeoff.

As for safety, if a motor is too low it can also adversely affect the handling. Even more so if you have to over trim the motor to get the boat out of the water.
ziemer is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 01:38 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 8
From: Southeast Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by ziemer
What prop are you running? Is there a nose cone on the lower? Where is the propshaft in relation to the Pad (bottom). By the looks of the video it looks like it could go at least one hole up. There's little spray off the prop until the motor becomes over trimmed. There also didn't appear to be hardly any cavitation at takeoff.

As for safety, if a motor is too low it can also adversely affect the handling. Even more so if you have to over trim the motor to get the boat out of the water.
No nosecone, but the 3.4L lowers are anchors and it only runs low 60's. Prop is a 23p Tempest (not plus). I can't remember if the propshaft was 3.5" or 3.75" below pad, but it was around there. 18" setback bracket. 1.65:1 ratio. Zero cavitation when tucked, the prop never gets loose from a dig. Same characteristics with a Mirage Plus, except the Mirage plus runs 2-3mph slower. A Mazco HP4 runs 1-2mph slower than the Tempest as well and it will loosen up on take-off, to the point that I won't run it when I know I'm going to be loaded down because it takes a bunch of effort to get on plane and isn't any faster. The day that video was shot it was 70*, about 50gal fuel, and 3 guys over 200lbs aboard. GPS showed a best speed of 61.7 and if the tach ever went over 5100rpm it wasn't while I was looking at it.
Speedracer29 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-22-2017 | 01:57 PM
  #8  
ziemer's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 5
From: St. Cloud, FL
Default

I would definitely try going up a hole. As long as you have water pressure, you should be good. At 18" of setback, I don't think that will be an issue though. Good luck with it!

Originally Posted by Speedracer29
No nosecone, but the 3.4L lowers are anchors and it only runs low 60's. Prop is a 23p Tempest (not plus). I can't remember if the propshaft was 3.5" or 3.75" below pad, but it was around there. 18" setback bracket. 1.65:1 ratio. Zero cavitation when tucked, the prop never gets loose from a dig. Same characteristics with a Mirage Plus, except the Mirage plus runs 2-3mph slower. A Mazco HP4 runs 1-2mph slower than the Tempest as well and it will loosen up on take-off, to the point that I won't run it when I know I'm going to be loaded down because it takes a bunch of effort to get on plane and isn't any faster. The day that video was shot it was 70*, about 50gal fuel, and 3 guys over 200lbs aboard. GPS showed a best speed of 61.7 and if the tach ever went over 5100rpm it wasn't while I was looking at it.
ziemer is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.