Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > Drives and Lower Units
Changed gear ratio from 1:5 to 1:36, and the prop, but no good?? >

Changed gear ratio from 1:5 to 1:36, and the prop, but no good??

Notices

Changed gear ratio from 1:5 to 1:36, and the prop, but no good??

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-05-2017 | 11:02 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 7
Question Changed gear ratio from 1:5 to 1:36, and the prop, but no good??

Changed my standard Bravo upper with an X upper and a different gear ratio. Wanted to stick with what I had, but ended up with a 1:36, so thought reducing the pitch of the prop I would end up with the same end result.

But the boat feels sluggish, and does not have the "punch" feel of power, I went from a 28 to a 24, lost around 5 MPH, but feels gutless.

Is this normal? does the X version use more HP? (I turned the drive shaft before installing, and it turned very easy)
2Slow4me is offline  
Reply
Old 06-06-2017 | 11:30 AM
  #2  
bor's Avatar
bor
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 728
Likes: 4
From: uithoorn,the netherlands
Default

My experience is that you only go back to 1.36 when you run out of prop so when you turn a 34-36" otherwise you have no benefit from it only the downsides you experienced .
bor is offline  
Reply
Old 06-06-2017 | 11:37 AM
  #3  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,450
Likes: 3,982
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

It takes a bunch of power to pull a 1.36 28p, I would think in the 700hp range depending on the hull and weight....what rpm are you seeing ?
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply
Old 06-06-2017 | 09:15 PM
  #4  
Tinkerer's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 7
From: ALTO, MI
Default

It takes a lot of torque to spin a 1:36 drive.
I had the same issue with my Daytona when I went to the -3 shortie 1:36 ratio. The old drive was a -2 shortie 1;50 ratio.
I figured that raising the prop an inch would help but it didn't. I lost 600 RPM ( from 6000 to 5400 )
The reason I did this is that I knew that I was going to build the 598 the next year.
The 598 has the torque to spin it.
Same prop I am now turning 6100 RPM
Tinkerer is offline  
Reply
Old 06-06-2017 | 10:46 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by F-2 Speedy
It takes a bunch of power to pull a 1.36 28p, I would think in the 700hp range depending on the hull and weight....what rpm are you seeing ?
Why does it take more HP to turn the 1:36? Based on theory, the 1:50 with a 28 is the same as the 1:36 with a 26.

I'm only running a stock old 454 magnum (370 HP) with CMI headers (so maybe 400 HP)

Last weekend, I ran the 24 70 MPH @ 4,500 and when I pushed past that, the motor felt like it was bogging, so I didn't push past that.

Its a small 20'7" very light eliminator V bottom with pad, and it fly's (flew) and rides like an outboard, very light very fun. Now it feels heavy like the boat gained 500 lbs...
2Slow4me is offline  
Reply
Old 06-07-2017 | 05:22 AM
  #6  
jeff32's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,234
Likes: 585
From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Default

My 97 sunsation 32 ran 1.36 with 23 mirage 3 blades on hp500 carbed motors and was really fun to drive, maxed out around 82-83 mph

you might want to try a 3 blades? Or lower your 4 blades pitch?

Or simply up the HP !!!
jeff32 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-07-2017 | 08:02 PM
  #7  
Tinkerer's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 7
From: ALTO, MI
Default

With the 1:36 ratio the prop spins faster for the same engine RPM that takes torque. Your stock or warmed up engine doesn't have the torque to spin that prop.
And someone told me it was 600 RPM difference between a 1:50 drive and a 1:36 drive with the same prop.
Tinkerer is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-2017 | 12:47 AM
  #8  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,285
Likes: 2,526
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

Going from a 1.50 to a 1.36 is generally about a 600rpm reduction or 3" of prop pitch.
I have 1.36's on my 32 AT with 502mpi's and spin 24 Bravos to 5100 rpms.
Its always had the 1.36's so I don't have anything to compare it to, but it accelerates well and never feels sluggish.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-2017 | 05:05 AM
  #9  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,031
Likes: 10
From: westville, NJ
Default

at least you are in the prop neighborhood where they can sometimes be borrowed to try out. somebody on your sand bar has a 21 or 23 mirage. I guess the 1.5 upper is dead, or you woulda switched back?
dereknkathy is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-2017 | 06:36 AM
  #10  
Mbam's Avatar
Offshoreonly Advertiser
25 Year Member
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,518
Likes: 284
From: Pompano Beach FL, USA
Default

I general a higher numerical ratio is faster. The prop turns slower so less mechanical energy is wasted turning the prop. The difference in RPM just from the math between a 1.5 and a 1.36 should be roughly 10% of your RPM with the 1.5. But it can be a liitle more as the boat is going slower also.

If you want to play with pitch/ratios you can use our calculator

Prop Slip Calculator
Mbam is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.