Twin 502 Mercruisers want ot be at different angles for alignement...>?
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 428
Likes: 3
Twin 502 Mercruisers want to be at different angles for alignement...>?
I am restoring the boat. I did a new transom and new transom assemblies on my Scarab 33AVS. Both engines are aligned perfectly with the bar alignment tool and the front of one engine sits about 1 inch higher.
I checked the transom assembly angles with a digital level and they are within 0.1 degrees of each other. The only thing that was unique is the standard double lock washers were too tall on the back engine mounts, so I used shims instead to achieve a perfect alignment, but I don't see how that has any effect. So I am stumped.
I am restoring the boat. I did a new transom and new transom assemblies on my Scarab 33AVS. Both engines are aligned perfectly with the bar alignment tool and the front of one engine sits about 1 inch higher.
I checked the transom assembly angles with a digital level and they are within 0.1 degrees of each other. The only thing that was unique is the standard double lock washers were too tall on the back engine mounts, so I used shims instead to achieve a perfect alignment, but I don't see how that has any effect. So I am stumped.
#2
Registered

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,197
Likes: 500
From: KY
Twin 502 Mercruisers want to be at different angles for alignement...>?
I am restoring the boat. I did a new transom and new transom assemblies on my Scarab 33AVS. Both engines are aligned perfectly with the bar alignment tool and the front of one engine sits about 1 inch higher.
I checked the transom assembly angles with a digital level and they are within 0.1 degrees of each other. The only thing that was unique is the standard double lock washers were too tall on the back engine mounts, so I used shims instead to achieve a perfect alignment, but I don't see how that has any effect. So I am stumped.
I am restoring the boat. I did a new transom and new transom assemblies on my Scarab 33AVS. Both engines are aligned perfectly with the bar alignment tool and the front of one engine sits about 1 inch higher.
I checked the transom assembly angles with a digital level and they are within 0.1 degrees of each other. The only thing that was unique is the standard double lock washers were too tall on the back engine mounts, so I used shims instead to achieve a perfect alignment, but I don't see how that has any effect. So I am stumped.
Is one hole a tad lower then the other, or stringers higher or lower?
#4
raising or lowering the rear mount with shims will raise or lower the front of the engine when using an alignment tool.
Use the exact same shims on the rear mounts for both engines and then raise or lower the front of the engines to get your alignment.
The gimbal bearing will angle to what you need for proper alignment.
I made an adapter similar to what is used on a TRS drive to make sure the rear mount is shimmed properly.
If the transom assemblies are new then as I said just use the same shims on both.
Use the exact same shims on the rear mounts for both engines and then raise or lower the front of the engines to get your alignment.
The gimbal bearing will angle to what you need for proper alignment.
I made an adapter similar to what is used on a TRS drive to make sure the rear mount is shimmed properly.
If the transom assemblies are new then as I said just use the same shims on both.
Last edited by Tinkerer; 06-28-2018 at 10:28 PM.




