260 br or 280br ?
#4
Registered

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 670
Likes: 117
From: Denton, MD
I enjoy the redundancy of twin engines myself, unfortunately I am not too knowledgeable of the newer Formula pleasure boats but the added confidence of always having two engines is worth every penny to me.
#5
Twins will double your maintenance bill and increase your fuel bills, but only slightly. If you do your own maintenance, you’ll hate the poor access to most items in the bilge, that’s just the way it is with twins in almost any boat.
If it’s any comparison, In 2007, I bought a new Sea Ray 270 SLX (bow rider) with a 6.2 320hp and Bravo 3. Nice boat but not fast. Low 40’s with fuel and 3-4 people. Load it up with gear and 7-8 people it was sluggish to plane, top speed dropped under 40, handling felt unresponsive and heavy. A bigger engine (496) would certainly have made a difference.
If speed isn’t a priority, I think a big block in a 26’ bow rider is a sensible package. Smaller than a 496 is a bit underpowered.
RR
If it’s any comparison, In 2007, I bought a new Sea Ray 270 SLX (bow rider) with a 6.2 320hp and Bravo 3. Nice boat but not fast. Low 40’s with fuel and 3-4 people. Load it up with gear and 7-8 people it was sluggish to plane, top speed dropped under 40, handling felt unresponsive and heavy. A bigger engine (496) would certainly have made a difference.
If speed isn’t a priority, I think a big block in a 26’ bow rider is a sensible package. Smaller than a 496 is a bit underpowered.
RR
#6
Registered

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
I know nothing of the formula line, but I know the Baja BR models ride a lot heavier than the cuddy models as the helm is further forward and has the aerodynamics of a toaster oven, so that big block power doesn’t go as far as you may be use to.
When I started looking at 29’ Scarabs the twin sbc option was way more popular than the single by all accounts, fwiw. Another plus for twin small blocks is you can up the power to a Bravo friendly 500 each and have a fairly reliable 1000hp boat.
When I started looking at 29’ Scarabs the twin sbc option was way more popular than the single by all accounts, fwiw. Another plus for twin small blocks is you can up the power to a Bravo friendly 500 each and have a fairly reliable 1000hp boat.
#9
Registered

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 262
Likes: 15
From: Fond du Lac, WI
i have a 280ss with 6.2's and wish there was more... cant imagine a single 280! i'm 5'10 190 and can stand in front of and between the engines.
#10
Registered

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 262
Likes: 15
From: Fond du Lac, WI
Twins will double your maintenance bill and increase your fuel bills, but only slightly. If you do your own maintenance, you’ll hate the poor access to most items in the bilge, that’s just the way it is with twins in almost any boat.
If it’s any comparison, In 2007, I bought a new Sea Ray 270 SLX (bow rider) with a 6.2 320hp and Bravo 3. Nice boat but not fast. Low 40’s with fuel and 3-4 people. Load it up with gear and 7-8 people it was sluggish to plane, top speed dropped under 40, handling felt unresponsive and heavy. A bigger engine (496) would certainly have made a difference.
If speed isn’t a priority, I think a big block in a 26’ bow rider is a sensible package. Smaller than a 496 is a bit underpowered.
RR
If it’s any comparison, In 2007, I bought a new Sea Ray 270 SLX (bow rider) with a 6.2 320hp and Bravo 3. Nice boat but not fast. Low 40’s with fuel and 3-4 people. Load it up with gear and 7-8 people it was sluggish to plane, top speed dropped under 40, handling felt unresponsive and heavy. A bigger engine (496) would certainly have made a difference.
If speed isn’t a priority, I think a big block in a 26’ bow rider is a sensible package. Smaller than a 496 is a bit underpowered.
RR




