Marc (BAM) got a question for you - New Merc 383 ECM
#1
Buddy of mine had one of these installed last year to replace a 6.2L MPI (377 cu in) that broke a piston in a 2001 272 Rinker. Boat has a BIII and was able to turn a 26" prop set past 5,000 RPM.
https://www.mercruiserparts.com/merc...61-383-mpi-bra
New 383 would only turn 4,400 - 4,600 RPM. Motor scans out good with 100% power, no codes. Merc tells his dealer it is the outdrive...needs rebuilt! Drive gets rebuilt as it was getting due anyway. No change. Then Merc tells dealer he needs to drop down in pitch on the props. WTF? More cu in, more HP, more torque and he needs to drop down in prop size?! OK, he finds a set of 24" props and now can turn 4,800 RPM but boat is still slower than with old engine and can't turn the RPM it used to.
Now to my question, is the ECM different between the new FWC 383 Merc offers vs. the old 6.2L MPI? Check out the ECM on his new engine shown below. Is this the real issue? Even if they use a 6.2L MPI ECM for the new 383's it doesn't cover the serial number range of the new engine. I know the two engines are close but... Thanks.



https://www.mercruiserparts.com/merc...61-383-mpi-bra
New 383 would only turn 4,400 - 4,600 RPM. Motor scans out good with 100% power, no codes. Merc tells his dealer it is the outdrive...needs rebuilt! Drive gets rebuilt as it was getting due anyway. No change. Then Merc tells dealer he needs to drop down in pitch on the props. WTF? More cu in, more HP, more torque and he needs to drop down in prop size?! OK, he finds a set of 24" props and now can turn 4,800 RPM but boat is still slower than with old engine and can't turn the RPM it used to.
Now to my question, is the ECM different between the new FWC 383 Merc offers vs. the old 6.2L MPI? Check out the ECM on his new engine shown below. Is this the real issue? Even if they use a 6.2L MPI ECM for the new 383's it doesn't cover the serial number range of the new engine. I know the two engines are close but... Thanks.



Last edited by Knot 4 Me; 06-28-2023 at 09:44 AM.
#2
Most likely it is different however I doubt if the ECM is the problem. 4-600 RPM represents a ton of horsepower.
__________________
Marc
www.mercruiserparts.com
www.go-fast.com
www.bammarine.com
www.cyborgtransmissions.com
It's not alive -www.BoatStuffExpress.com - temporarily retired
Marc
www.mercruiserparts.com
www.go-fast.com
www.bammarine.com
www.cyborgtransmissions.com
It's not alive -www.BoatStuffExpress.com - temporarily retired
#6
That was the first thing that came to my mind as well. It is indeed firing on all 8. Makes it even more of a head scratcher.
#7
No idea what the gap is and I doubt the Merc tech nor Merc are focusing on plug gap. As long as it is under warranty I doubt my buddy would deviate from the factory spec. Don't want to give Merc any ammo to deny a warranty. I agree that gap seems needlessly large. I know I closed it up some when I put plugs in my 496 MAG.
#8
Registered

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 391
Likes: 9
From: Denmark
If using a prop shaft dyno it should be fairly straight forward to test the engine.
#9
Registered

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 852
If the engine is under warranty, a merc dealer should be dealing with the issue, if there is an internal issue - you would be wasting your time chasing your tail and it still has to go through merc dealers to get warranty
Trying to figure it out up to a point is natural but your buddy has already paid for the warranty.
+1 on the prop shaft dyno test while hooked to a laptop for diags
Trying to figure it out up to a point is natural but your buddy has already paid for the warranty.
+1 on the prop shaft dyno test while hooked to a laptop for diags
#10




