Angles on Outside of 280 K Planesn
#4
When I raced my single Pantera, (dont need the clearance of the angle as already mentioned) I flipped my 280 tabs around and ran the angle side out. It allowed the tab to contact the water sooner and/or at higher speed. Used to drive Jo nuts!
#6
#8
Registered


Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 415
From: BC
This may be a good discussion thread for trim tab elevation from the hull. ( k-plane base height on transom)
I understand that you don't want k-planes to interfere with the hydrodynamic flow when not required. But wouldn't having them just flush with the transom, and angled up 4° (same as the rise of off transom water flow...being 0° trim tab) be optimal? When in use, there is a better angle of flow, beginning at the root of the tab, vs way down the length of tab, it they are raised?
The result being when in neutral (4° up position) the planes would act as lengthening the hull dynamics?
My 280s ara a full inch above the transom base, parallel. I think 380s would be far better for the application. Better water angles...and less of a water brake.
Angles facing in...would add to that issue?
I understand that you don't want k-planes to interfere with the hydrodynamic flow when not required. But wouldn't having them just flush with the transom, and angled up 4° (same as the rise of off transom water flow...being 0° trim tab) be optimal? When in use, there is a better angle of flow, beginning at the root of the tab, vs way down the length of tab, it they are raised?
The result being when in neutral (4° up position) the planes would act as lengthening the hull dynamics?
My 280s ara a full inch above the transom base, parallel. I think 380s would be far better for the application. Better water angles...and less of a water brake.
Angles facing in...would add to that issue?






