Bigger valves for 781 ovals
#1
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 682
Likes: 176
From: Finland
Is the original gm hardened seat enough for the exhaust? and if so, what size valve can be used keeping the seat hardened.
Some say you need to use additives with these old heads, and some say it is bull$$.
Some say you need to use additives with these old heads, and some say it is bull$$.
Last edited by JaniH; 11-07-2023 at 02:02 PM.
#3
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 682
Likes: 176
From: Finland
#4
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
5/16” pushrods?
Stock valves?
equals disaster but considering that’s not your question I won’t go there. However valves and seats are crucial regardless of additives etc. I know making the power with your heads isn’t a big deal but making it last is. If heads been ported im assuming they’ve been flowed? You’re about peaked out with rpm and “definitely” with lift.
Please provide casting number on heads. A little bit confusing when referring to 781’s and peanut port heads. Entirely different. Just sayin
Last edited by getrdunn; 11-08-2023 at 09:38 AM.
#5
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 682
Likes: 176
From: Finland
What casting number on the heads?
5/16” pushrods?
Stock valves?
equals disaster but considering that’s not your question I won’t go there. However valves and seats are crucial regardless of additives etc. I know making the power with your heads isn’t a big deal but making it last is. If heads been ported im assuming they’ve been flowed? You’re about peaked out with rpm and “definitely” with lift.
Please provide casting number on heads. A little bit confusing when referring to 781’s and peanut port heads. Entirely different. Just sayin
5/16” pushrods?
Stock valves?
equals disaster but considering that’s not your question I won’t go there. However valves and seats are crucial regardless of additives etc. I know making the power with your heads isn’t a big deal but making it last is. If heads been ported im assuming they’ve been flowed? You’re about peaked out with rpm and “definitely” with lift.
Please provide casting number on heads. A little bit confusing when referring to 781’s and peanut port heads. Entirely different. Just sayin
#6
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
The flow ratio is decent for GM heads. I remember GM heads always liked a bigger split (10-12 deg + -) due to the poor exh etc. If you have a good reliable package I’d call it a day unless you go aftermarket otherwise your gain going to be so minimal I wouldn’t think would be worth all the time, effort and expense. JMO of course.
#7
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 682
Likes: 176
From: Finland
The flow ratio is decent for GM heads. I remember GM heads always liked a bigger split (10-12 deg + -) due to the poor exh etc. If you have a good reliable package I’d call it a day unless you go aftermarket otherwise your gain going to be so minimal I wouldn’t think would be worth all the time, effort and expense. JMO of course.
#9
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 682
Likes: 176
From: Finland
You are right! I just need to take a account my hole combination of parts. The gm roller lifters might be a problem at higher rpms with max recomended spring pressures 140/380lbs , 230/236 @ 050" cam might pull quite high with good set of heads.


