Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Yes I have a NEW 496 8100 HP3 MOD 3 from Inv Marine >

Yes I have a NEW 496 8100 HP3 MOD 3 from Inv Marine

Notices

Yes I have a NEW 496 8100 HP3 MOD 3 from Inv Marine

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-23-2025 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 175
Likes: 50
Default Yes I have a NEW 496 8100 HP3 MOD 3 from Inv Marine

This new HP3 is going in my Nordic. Here is a pic of what's under the valve covers.
It exists, there are 12 left that are new.

this one is a MOD 3. It dynos at 559 at 5400 540 tq






Cerberus66 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-23-2025 | 06:05 PM
  #2  
jeff32's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,216
Likes: 572
From: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Default

Never heard of those ! Where are the others new ones?
jeff32 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-23-2025 | 06:10 PM
  #3  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 531
Default

Very cool.

Just make sure you stay on top of the valve springs. From my memory the valve to piston clearance was TIGHT.
underpsi68 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-2025 | 03:12 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 175
Likes: 50
Default

Originally Posted by underpsi68
Very cool.

Just make sure you stay on top of the valve springs. From my memory the valve to piston clearance was TIGHT.
These motor are all dyno'd at the factory and leave perfect.
There are zero issues only a few articles that made that claim the tolerance was tight. They run flawlessly.

there are only 12 left
Cerberus66 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-2025 | 03:12 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 175
Likes: 50
Default

Originally Posted by jeff32
Never heard of those ! Where are the others new ones?

There are 12 left.
Cerberus66 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-2025 | 04:13 PM
  #6  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,418
Likes: 3,938
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

Clearance to tight because they're a truck engine, who is reworking these to open up clearances ?
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-2025 | 04:24 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 175
Likes: 50
Default

Originally Posted by F-2 Speedy
Clearance to tight because they're a truck engine, who is reworking these to open up clearances ?
LOL every BBC is a truck engine.

Search HP3 here and Google. These are very specially built engines by Innovation marine for GM Marine division.

These motors out performed the Blue top 500 and 525 and half the cost. Gen 5 and Gen 6 motors are ancient tech.
Cerberus66 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-29-2025 | 06:55 PM
  #8  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,418
Likes: 3,938
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

ya you keep believing that, so the L-88 and ZL1 427's are truck engines....your knowledge is impressive pics of the valve springs are also very impressive...........good luck with your truck engine

Last edited by F-2 Speedy; 05-29-2025 at 07:30 PM.
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply
Old 05-30-2025 | 06:22 AM
  #9  
VIP Member
Community Builder
VIP Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,461
Likes: 2,089
From: SW Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by F-2 Speedy
Clearance to tight because they're a truck engine, who is reworking these to open up clearances ?
F2,

As I understand it, GM purpose built these engines as marine engines, not as "truck" engines. They essentially did everything that Merc should have done to the 8.1 truck engine during marinization. It's everything the 496HO SHOULD have been. And they performed so well that Merc threw a hissie and bullied GM into discontinuing them.

Thanks. Brad.
Brad Christy is online now  
Reply
Old 05-30-2025 | 06:34 AM
  #10  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 451
From: Bourbonnais, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Brad Christy
F2,

As I understand it, GM purpose built these engines as marine engines, not as "truck" engines. They essentially did everything that Merc should have done to the 8.1 truck engine during marinization. It's everything the 496HO SHOULD have been. And they performed so well that Merc threw a hissie and bullied GM into discontinuing them.

Thanks. Brad.
Brad,
Do you think you would of been ahead fiscally if you bought one of these motors and bolted on your Procharger instead of rebuilding what you have?
SecondWind is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.