Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Fuel / HP curve for 454 mag >

Fuel / HP curve for 454 mag

Notices
General Boating Discussion

Fuel / HP curve for 454 mag

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-09-2004 | 05:42 PM
  #1  
Stormrider's Avatar
Thread Starter
JC Performance Engines
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,904
Likes: 33
From: Long Island, NY
Default Fuel / HP curve for 454 mag

Does anyone have the graph for HP/ fuel usage
for a 1988-89 454 mag 365hp?
Stormrider is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2004 | 11:26 AM
  #2  
Stormrider's Avatar
Thread Starter
JC Performance Engines
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,904
Likes: 33
From: Long Island, NY
Default

No one has this?
Or does anyone know the fuel burn rate at certain RPMs?

rob
Stormrider is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2004 | 11:38 AM
  #3  
mikev's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Cumming, GA.
Default

fuel burn rate would vary depending on the boat it was in. a heavier boat will require more throttle to maintain the same rpms vs. a lighter boat. same reason you get worse gas mileage towing your boat vs. driving your truck unloaded.
mikev is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2004 | 12:09 PM
  #4  
Stormrider's Avatar
Thread Starter
JC Performance Engines
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,904
Likes: 33
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Are you sure that's right?

If an engine is turning 3000rpm it needs so much fuel to turn. Why would it need more fuel to turn the same RPM.
I understand you need more rpm to run a greater speed in a heavier boat.
But shouldn't rpm be rpm under any load?
Isn't the fuel metered to a specific amount per cylinder per crank turn?
Stormrider is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2004 | 12:13 PM
  #5  
mikev's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Cumming, GA.
Default

nope your truck runs the same rpm at 70 with a load or not but you get different mileage pulling a load vs. running empty
mikev is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2004 | 12:15 PM
  #6  
Payton's Avatar
Charter Member #927
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,834
Likes: 2
From: IN
Default

an engne under load will burn a lot more fuel than an engine running under a light load at the same rpm. So the fuel curve will vary from one application to another.
Payton is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2004 | 12:29 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 3
From: PA and MD
Default

All you can say is that at WOT you will burn between 35-40 GPH per motor.
cobra marty is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2004 | 12:38 PM
  #8  
Stormrider's Avatar
Thread Starter
JC Performance Engines
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,904
Likes: 33
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Thanks guys, that is the info I was looking for.
I'll be installing a fuel flow meter that has a 35gph max.

If WOT is 40gph, than I'll be under 35gph more than 95% of the time. Which means the damn thing should be pretty accurate. As opposed to cruising at 3200-3400rpm burning 40gph.

This is what I just got from Merc.
1600rpm 3.6gph
2500rpm 7.3gph
3500rpm 13.4gph
4500rpm 24.3gph

that is as high as they go.
Stormrider is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2004 | 03:12 PM
  #9  
ragtop409's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 1
From: Maximo FLA
Default

Also depends on the size of prop you turn and the load it creates. I get better milage and mor RPM's with my 23 pitch but the GPS says the 25 pitch is faster at a lower RPM's and uses more gas. go figure Rag's
ragtop409 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-2004 | 03:35 PM
  #10  
CAP071's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 16,435
Likes: 2
From: USA
Default

Just plan on spending lots of $$$ on gas this summer anyway
CAP071 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.