Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
ok this may be a stupid question...... >

ok this may be a stupid question......

Notices

ok this may be a stupid question......

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-18-2004 | 05:14 PM
  #1  
wwwTOPDJcom's Avatar
Thread Starter
VIP Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,514
Likes: 4
From: Vestal/Binghamton NY
Question ok this may be a stupid question......

how come no one makes a Big straight 6 like 400-500 cu inch, 400hp +.
seems like it would be easier to work on in a boat with a twin setup,
and reduced weight.
wwwTOPDJcom is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2004 | 06:27 PM
  #2  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 20
From: Westport, Kentucky
Default Re: ok this may be a stupid question......

Hmmm... interesting thought. And it would sound like a bread truck. Seems that the old pickup trucks with straight six's did pull pretty good.
BadDog is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2004 | 06:57 PM
  #3  
formula31's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 1
From: ohio
Default Re: ok this may be a stupid question......

There was an old Mathews that I worked on in the 60's that had a big 6 cylinder (about the size of a vw bug) that had twin plugs in the top for each cylinder. Cant remember the brand name but it was in a very old 40 ft mathews, single screw.
formula31 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2004 | 08:09 PM
  #4  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 400
Likes: 8
From: Wisconsin
Default Re: ok this may be a stupid question......

What would be interesting is a pair of narrow angle v6's with screw chargers! I'll bet they could get to the 400hp range.
Falcon is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2004 | 08:39 PM
  #5  
Reed Jensen's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles California
Default Re: ok this may be a stupid question......

There used to be an engine builder years ago that made HUGE gas 6 cylinder engines for trucks... The name of the engine was " Hall-Scott"... They made small engines also for cars back in the late twenties. But... most people don't know that inline 6 cylinder engines of the same cubic inches as a V-8 weigh more... a lot more.
You have 7 main bearings instead of 5. The block and crankshaft are heavier. Instead of only 4 throws for the 8 cylinders.. Each cylinder has it's own crankshaft throw. The only advantage is width. Not too many people make speed equipment for inline 6 cylinder engines.
Reed Jensen is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2004 | 08:41 PM
  #6  
Reed Jensen's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles California
Default Re: ok this may be a stupid question......

Originally Posted by Falcon
What would be interesting is a pair of narrow angle v6's with screw chargers! I'll bet they could get to the 400hp range.
That is what "Torque" motors was trying to do with their 60 degree V-12... make a narrow, powerful, unsupercharged engine. But they had too many "issues"...
Reed Jensen is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2004 | 08:58 PM
  #7  
HyperBaja's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 0
From: Lewis Center, Ohio
Default Re: ok this may be a stupid question......

Originally Posted by Reed Jensen
That is what "Torque" motors was trying to do with their 60 degree V-12... make a narrow, powerful, unsupercharged engine. But they had too many "issues"...
Any update on how callan did with these last race season?
HyperBaja is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2004 | 09:00 PM
  #8  
Reed Jensen's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles California
Default Re: ok this may be a stupid question......

Originally Posted by HyperBaja
Any update on how callan did with these last race season?
I know they installed some ... I learned that from a magazine article... other than that... nada.....
Reed Jensen is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2004 | 09:20 PM
  #9  
mcollinstn's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,769
Likes: 150
From: tn
Default Re: ok this may be a stupid question......

Originally Posted by wwwTOPDJcom
how come no one makes a Big straight 6 like 400-500 cu inch, 400hp +.
seems like it would be easier to work on in a boat with a twin setup,
and reduced weight.
You never heard of a Cummins or Caterpillar? I assure you the narrow-ness of an inline six is a benefit.

As far as a big gas motor, 4 liters is about the high end of the range for a straight six.
Hop up parts? Here you go:
http://www.cliffordperformance.com/
mcollinstn is offline  
Reply
Old 12-18-2004 | 09:24 PM
  #10  
Reed Jensen's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles California
Default Re: ok this may be a stupid question......

Originally Posted by mcollinstn
You never heard of a Cummins or Caterpillar? I assure you the narrow-ness of an inline six is a benefit.

As far as a big gas motor, 4 liters is about the high end of the range for a straight six.
Hop up parts? Here you go:
http://www.cliffordperformance.com/
Since he didn't mention Diesel... I was assuming he was talking about gas engines. EVERYONE knows there are inline diesel engines.
Reed Jensen is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.