What part of "Ben Kramer is coming home" do you not understand?
#1
What part of "Ben Kramer is coming home" do you not understand?
Get the popcorn goin' -- Benny is comin' back...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/01/12/sc....ap/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/01/12/sc....ap/index.html
#2
Full version of the opinion:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...0&invol=04-104
I am going to get a beer or two. I'll check this thread when I get home.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...0&invol=04-104
I am going to get a beer or two. I'll check this thread when I get home.
#3
Can you go to the actual opinion and find that language or anything that seems to say that? I couldn't, but I will admit to reading it VERY quickly. Also, a non retroactive application would seem to be at odds with finding Sec. 3553 unconstitutional. I think (on my cursory reading) the opinion seems to imply that retroactivity will be required.
And I really am going to get a beer now.
And I really am going to get a beer now.
#5
Registered

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,819
Likes: 14
From: cleveland
has any one thought of printing out the entire apache whats in a name thread and mail it to benny?
hes got the time to read the whole thing!!!!!!
also i recommend adding the free ben kramer thread also
hes got the time to read the whole thing!!!!!!
also i recommend adding the free ben kramer thread also
#7
#10
Originally Posted by dreamer
has any one thought of printing out the entire apache whats in a name thread and mail it to benny?


