To rebuild or replace that is the question
#21
Registered
Patience Grasshopper. If some one can provide me with the double top secret Mercury Racing Dyno sheet for the 400Rs I'm ready to calculate out the torque vs surface area of the three screaming memes versus the two roaring tigers with the "Club Foot lower unit"
[ATTACH=CONFIG]553289[/ATTACH]
Then again I may just get my kids to do the calculations.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]553289[/ATTACH]
Then again I may just get my kids to do the calculations.
#22
Registered User
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Toms River,NJ
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Twin 400r's with fluids (motors only) 1368lbs
Triple 300x's 1440lbs (motors only)
Also 1extra trim pump and battery.
975hp vs 800hp.
3ea smaller lower units vs 2ea club foots.
boat for boat IMO I think the triple 300x set up will eat a 400r package for lunch. I can't imagine as hard as my boat pulls now what it would be like with a 3rd motor. Or maybe I can
Guess we all need to go for a ride in Steve's boat LOL!!!!
Gotta love this stuff
Triple 300x's 1440lbs (motors only)
Also 1extra trim pump and battery.
975hp vs 800hp.
3ea smaller lower units vs 2ea club foots.
boat for boat IMO I think the triple 300x set up will eat a 400r package for lunch. I can't imagine as hard as my boat pulls now what it would be like with a 3rd motor. Or maybe I can
Guess we all need to go for a ride in Steve's boat LOL!!!!
Gotta love this stuff
#23
Registered
Well we've discussed this at length and I agree, but I've kind of been trained to look at numbers and crap like that. I can't find the Torque/HP curve for the 400R anywhere. But with super chargers it's got to make some serious torque and torque makes boats fly. When Pete was in Steve's boat for the dial in he said it pulled hard like a bigger I/O boats. So we know 114 vs 120+ In top speed is given so far but in the mid range where I live what will the difference be? Will heavier more powerful triple 300X or XS with three lower units in the water pull away or will it be even in the 50 to 100 range? I bet there will be very little difference and the 400Rs may surprise you in mid range. I know my old 338 is heavy as a tank but is stupid quick the with big torque the super charger produces.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]553284[/ATTACH]
Courtesy DBR
Does anyone have this info for the 400R??
[ATTACH=CONFIG]553284[/ATTACH]
Courtesy DBR
Does anyone have this info for the 400R??
[ATTACH=CONFIG]553338[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]553339[/ATTACH]
#25
Registered
Yes they are different. One is torque and one is HP,comparing a Yamaha YZ125 (blue line) to a Yamaha 250F ( Yellow line). A 125 - 2 stroke will keep up with a 250 -4 in good conditions. Add up hills, sand, etc. and the torque of the 4 will blast away! In a bike with gears, you shift less with the 4 because of the wide torque band, corner to corner and on starts. HP is HP and weight is weight as we all have been preaching! The midrange punch of the 400's should be stunning though! Top end not so much in my opinion. If they (400's) were lightweight, they would by on my 28 however. I think that is why the work so well on CC's. Back in 1997 when Doug Henry won the AMA outdoor MX title on a prototype 400 cc Yamaha four stroke against a field of 250 -2 strokes, it was approx. 250# bike with 40HP against 230#, 50 HP 2 -strokes. Ten years later the are 450cc, 230# and 50+ HP and reliable as hell! Maybe, with some R&D, the big boys will make a lightweight, high HP four. I know it can be done.
Last edited by Taboma; 04-01-2016 at 02:29 PM.