Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   Superboat (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/superboat-44/)
-   -   y2k bottom evolution (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/superboat/290846-y2k-bottom-evolution.html)

Ted G 02-12-2013 03:27 PM


Originally Posted by Superbabi (Post 3866026)
Lighten up Ted, just playing with you !!! Although Superbabi was built for Big hp.

Must be why she has treated me so well, taking it easy on her in her golden years :lolhit:

OCCJoe 02-12-2013 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by Superbabi (Post 3866011)
2 years into the hull and your running her all wrong, must be all that Low Hp your your pushing thru her prop.

LOL ! Busted a laugh on that one ..
Ted the race layup boats are heavier not lighter and one thing that has been proven is that all the Y2k run different

fantastixvoyage 02-12-2013 04:51 PM


Originally Posted by OCCJoe (Post 3866070)
and one thing that has been proven is that all the Y2k run different

Any comparison in x-dimensions? Bet the propshaft heights have varied a bunch depending on the expected application. Willing to be superbabi is set high and hence not much reaction to trim.

OCCJoe 02-12-2013 04:52 PM


Originally Posted by Ted G (Post 3866018)
A little over 75 GPS with a four blade prop and 500 hp and I'm running it wrong? How so? In full race trim the F1 boats only ran 77-79 when light? And I can cruise 60 at 3 MPG with the Maximus, not sure how you are gonna get much more out of it. BTW, I think the Maximus was part of your performance problems, when I had it prop scanned there was over an inch pitch variation between the blades, it runs much cleaner now that it was trued up to an even 26 on all 5 blades.

Ted just playing with you but a quote from May 2011..


Originally Posted by OCCJoe (Post 3408653)
That hull is going to be saying (what the hell have you done to me , 74 mph I used to do that at idol ) Lol
Don't worry bout the lights , just don't pull over and they won"t catch you .


Originally Posted by Ted G (Post 3408661)
It might go a little faster than 74 :drink:

I thought you were gonna get in the 80-90 club and now your selling it . What are you switching to ?

OCCJoe 02-12-2013 04:59 PM


Originally Posted by fantastixvoyage (Post 3866071)
Any comparison in x-dimensions? Bet the propshaft heights have varied a bunch depending on the expected application. Willing to be superbabi is set high and hence not much reaction to trim.

Coen found an X that worked well and stuck with it ! The lack of trim reaction is from lack of HP . 800 with that same trim would make dramatic changes in the attitude . I'm not knocking the HP in Ted's boat either because it looks like he's getting killer MPG and running in the 70's is still a lot of fun

Ted G 02-12-2013 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by OCCJoe (Post 3866070)
LOL ! Busted a laugh on that one ..
Ted the race layup boats are heavier not lighter and one thing that has been proven is that all the Y2k run different


Originally Posted by OCCJoe (Post 3866072)
Ted just playing with you but a quote from May 2011..





I thought you were gonna get in the 80-90 club and now your selling it . What are you switching to ?

Pretty sure mine is race layup too, Gary pretty much bought everything in the catalog :lolhit: When I said light I mean low fuel and not much stuff, mine has stereo, porta pottie, cooler, etc, etc.

I did go faster than 74...just not much. I had/have access to LOTS more power if I wanted it, but then I would get into drive issues so I left well enough alone. And gas mileage is a good thing:party-smiley-004:

If I sell it we are looking at an Intrepid Center Console, just like everyone else with performance boats right now :whistle:

OCCJoe 02-12-2013 05:10 PM


Originally Posted by Ted G (Post 3866077)
Pretty sure mine is race layup too, Gary pretty much bought everything in the catalog :lolhit: When I said light I mean low fuel and not much stuff, mine has stereo, porta pottie, cooler, etc, etc.

I did go faster than 74...just not much. I had/have access to LOTS more power if I wanted it, but then I would get into drive issues so I left well enough alone. And gas mileage is a good thing:party-smiley-004:

If I sell it we are looking at an Intrepid Center Console, just like everyone else with performance boats right now :whistle:

Have you tried dumping to porta-pottie :lolhit: ?????

Supreboat in 02-12-2013 10:21 PM

Has anyone had problems with reversion with their y2k. The owner I bought my boat from had lots of trouble with this. Has had to have the motor redone a few times due to this. The boats sit low in the back and with the swim platform and side supports coming out to the platform it makes a perfect trap for water when stoping or reversing or just waves while idling. He had to have the exhaust modified with a 4in extension on top of the thunder exhaust manifolds to increase the angle of decent going out thru the transom. The motor is a big cubic in 565 with a pretty large cam witch doesn't help matters. I am wanting to put my CMI sport tube headers on but don't know if it would be a bad decision and possibly make the reversion situation worse.

Ted G 02-12-2013 11:52 PM

Yes, ideally you should run dry exhaust with that engine and I added flappers on my exhaust pipes to help some. On one occasion it gulped water in reverse and almost died, a little throttle blip cleared it.

Dave M 02-13-2013 06:27 AM

I'm running rubber flappers on the outside too. I had internal flappers but they made an annoying rattling sound so I took them out. I'm always real careful coming off plane.

Oh, and my boat doesn't require a lot of trim either. About "3" on the indicator is my sweet spot. I have ITS though, not sure how that factors in.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.