![]() |
Originally Posted by pookie
(Post 2264340)
There have been several entries on recent threads that compare the Ford F650 to the Freightliner FL70 Sportchassis. They seem to strongly favor the Sportchassis for ride, stability, warranty, service, and dealer network. Do you agree?
He has driven my SportChassis with the MBZ motor and he said it is much better performance than his F650 with the C7 motor. He keeps looking for upgrades that would add a ton of HP to the C7. He hates that motor in his truck. He has even considered putting in a powerstroke or something which would be a mistake. |
So you got the MBZ motor with 1,000ft/lb's of torque and how many HP?
|
330hp 1000tq the also have a 410hp available but to go from the 330hp to 410hp is like 22k, the 300hp were like 860trq.
|
Originally Posted by pookie
(Post 2264340)
There have been several entries on recent threads that compare the Ford F650 to the Freightliner FL70 Sportchassis. They seem to strongly favor the Sportchassis for ride, stability, warranty, service, and dealer network. Do you agree?
|
Originally Posted by OSO
(Post 2265256)
FL70 is the much older truck no?
|
Originally Posted by pookie
(Post 2264340)
There have been several entries on recent threads that compare the Ford F650 to the Freightliner FL70 Sportchassis. They seem to strongly favor the Sportchassis for ride, stability, warranty, service, and dealer network. Do you agree?
My preference is for the purpose-built truck. The Ford and GM use the same cab as their light-duty pickups. Compared to a FL/KW/Pete/Int'l, there's much less overall room, especially headroom. You see many of the Ford/GM's with bubble roof extensions. If you have an air-ride seat, you'll need it. If you're over 6', get used to smacking your head. Plus, you sit with your legs out in front like a pickup. In a medium, you're sitting upright, as you would sitting in a chair. The interior is one of those chocolate/vanilla things. The service availability is a tangible asset. That is a big deal for us as we have trucks in 5 states and if they aren't on the road, we're losing $$. It's a rare occurrence though. It's not like we have a fleet of OTR tractors with 1MM+ on them. These things are exceptionally reliable. They're not even broken in until 80K+ and I've never had an expensive service issue under 400K- they'tre usually done before that anyway. We maybe have a couple of unexpected issues a year. If you equip it properly, there is no bad choice. If you buy a used C&C that used to be a delivery truck, don't expect the same performance & comfort as a purpose-built toy hauler. As far as comfort, the Ford s I've driven seemed very pleasant. It's pretty much the same stuff under the cab, regardless of the name on it. Ford doesn't make anything but the cab. Neither does anyone else. If you buy equivalent leaf-spring or air-ride chassis', they're going to be virtually identical in comfort and capability. |
Ive Got An 08 F450 4wd That Tows A 50 Hustler That Weighs 21000 On The Trailer. I Have Good Brakes On The Trailer And Have Had No Issues Whatsoever With The Performance Or Safety Of My Combination.
|
Is it a fifth wheel or conventional trailer? How far do you tow it?
|
After reading some of the launch ramp problems with the medium duty conversions, I'm leaning toward the F450 with four wheel drive! Especially if it ows a Hustler 50 PY without a problem.
|
Originally Posted by fountain 47 sc
(Post 2266219)
Especially if it ows a Hustler 50 PY without a problem.
If you wait long enough, someone will happen along and tell you exactly what you want to hear. There have been more than a few people on here that have owned multiple combinations of boats and rigs in that weight range that have in almost all cases said there's a tremendous difference between the 450 and the medium. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.