![]() |
Originally Posted by vindicator101
(Post 3521492)
I understand what everyone is saying about the 5.3L getting better mileage due to displacement but if you compare 6.0L all wheel drive to 6.0L 4WD then doesn't the all wheel drive actually get better mileage? Sounds crazy but on the newer (post '03) push button 4WD's all the drive components are turning, just not being "driven" which leads to friction drag and a waste of energy causing more fuel consumption.
Wannabe |
My wife has an 09 Yukon Denali XL with the 6.2.Before I got it for her I drove a Yukon XL with the 5.3.Its night night and day performance wise.And the Denali has AWD the Yukon with the 5.3 just had 4 wheel that could be turned on an off.
Around town wife gets around 14 but on the highway we have seen 18. |
Originally Posted by wannabe
(Post 3521526)
No it's just the opposite, AWD means all the time drivetrain is working. 4wd is only when 4wd is selected. In AWD there is a center clutch to slip between front and rear when taking tight corners.
Wannabe |
Originally Posted by vindicator101
(Post 3521628)
Agreed as far as the AWD version. Would you agree that on the 4WD that the front drive shaft and front axles are turning since they're still "locked in" at the front wheels even when it's in 2WD mode? That's my line of thinking.
Wannabe |
Originally Posted by wannabe
(Post 3521643)
No in 2wd mode the front shafts and hubs do not turn. The GM system uses automatic locking hubs. Ford on the other hand uses manual hubs on many (not all) of their vehicles.
Wannabe |
Originally Posted by wannabe
(Post 3521643)
No in 2wd mode the front shafts and hubs do not turn. The GM system uses automatic locking hubs. Ford on the other hand uses manual hubs on many (not all) of their vehicles.
Wannabe |
Originally Posted by wannabe
(Post 3521643)
No in 2wd mode the front shafts and hubs do not turn. The GM system uses automatic locking hubs. Ford on the other hand uses manual hubs on many (not all) of their vehicles.
Wannabe GM hasn't used 'hubs' since they put a solid axle under the front of the trucks/blazers/suburbans (granted the subs/blazers didn't change body style/axle until 91-ish). |
Thanks for the advice. She drove a camaro ss and liked that. It's going to be a tough choice.
|
My '06 6.0L 3.73 AWD Denali XL was lucky to see 16 MPG highway. This is hand calculated mileage, not going off the DIC. It never passed a gas station it didn't want to pull into. I liked the extra power over a 5.3L truck when towing. If it is a daily driver that will only see occasional light towing duty, I would stick with the 5.3L.
|
Originally Posted by Knot 4 Me
(Post 3521823)
My '06 6.0L 3.73 AWD Denali XL was lucky to see 16 MPG highway. This is hand calculated mileage, not going off the DIC. It never passed a gas station it didn't want to pull into. I liked the extra power over a 5.3L truck when towing. If it is a daily driver that will only see occasional light towing duty, I would stick with the 5.3L.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.