![]() |
the new dodge trucks have garmin for built in GPS. what pisses me off is my nuvi 250 is $70 for lifetime updates. the one in the truck is over $300 for ONE update. I use the hand held 90% of the time.
Originally Posted by soldier4402
(Post 3670849)
True and competiton drives innovation and lowers prices. what irriatetes me to this day on trucks(sorry for the rant) Is 90% of us have Garmins GPS why cant somebody build something into the dash with a plug so we dont have to stick to winshield or drill holes. I know a lot of GPS are different but you would think they could come up with a common design.:lolhit:
Also chevy has been out with the side doors on extended cabs that open all the way for what 6 years now and dodge has actual doors on their extended cabs yet Ford still has the dumb ace doors that open half way. My guess its an attempt to have you spend 4 grand on two doors and another foot of sheet metal on the cab. |
I have had two duramaxes ('02 LB7 and 08 LMM in a 4500 kodiak.), as well as a 06 5.9 2500 mega cab and an '11 6.7 2500 quad cab. All of these motors have performed shockingly well for me. I have to say, though, having the Allison in the Kodiak makes a world of a difference. I just pulled a flatbed that was about 10k (and the truck weighs 12 to start with) up from CA to portland this morning. It amazes me how that transmission can handle the power, stay in lockup in any gear, and shift smoother than any car, even under load. The cummins motor might be torquier, but the 68rfe, while night and day compared to the old 4 speed just doesn't work as well. I wish Dodge would tune their torque converters to hook up so we could use the motor.
I had the zf 6 speed manual in the '02 Chevy. The clutch judder made pulling boats out and maneuvering trailers a lot less fun than it should have been. Had I know how good the Allison was back then, I'd never have gone with the manual. |
Originally Posted by cbrahs
(Post 3671283)
the new dodge trucks have garmin for built in GPS. what pisses me off is my nuvi 250 is $70 for lifetime updates. the one in the truck is over $300 for ONE update. I use the hand held 90% of the time.
What I am reffering to is something like a slot or cup holder build into the top of the dash with a plug where you could slide the gps in and plug it in or put the gps mount and all into the dash |
Originally Posted by Jassman
(Post 3671158)
Dont count the Dodge interior out. Dont know if MB had any influences when they were involved with the Chrysler Group..but it is nicely done. The seats are not quite as comfortable or is as long where your butt sits, as compared to the Fords..but the overall execution was done extremely well. The GM's interior in our 11 is like my 06 GMC..nothing has changed except the color of the leather..Jeff
|
Ok now the arguments are over lets see some of these bad azz trucks no matter what make.
|
Until they start putting Allison's in Fords and Dodges, I'll stick with GM...........
|
Originally Posted by soldier4402
(Post 3671349)
Do interiors really matter? Man I dont know how many times I have seen somebody hauling and been like nice interior. Thats one thing I could care less about. I mean guess if two brands were even than maybe that would be the deciding factor.
|
3 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by rssteiny
(Post 3671384)
Ok now the arguments are over lets see some of these bad azz trucks no matter what make.
|
Originally Posted by soldier4402
(Post 3671349)
Do interiors really matter? Man I dont know how many times I have seen somebody hauling and been like nice interior. Thats one thing I could care less about. I mean guess if two brands were even than maybe that would be the deciding factor.
|
5 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by cbrahs
(Post 3670191)
have you worked on a ford lately? :lolhit:
|
Originally Posted by soldier4402
(Post 3671349)
Do interiors really matter? Man I dont know how many times I have seen somebody hauling and been like nice interior. Thats one thing I could care less about. I mean guess if two brands were even than maybe that would be the deciding factor.
Sam |
Originally Posted by Neverfastenuf
(Post 3671658)
I have to agree with Jeff and Nort. Interiors make a big difference to me. I guess to each his own :ernaehrung004:
Sam |
I guess if your job is to ride in that truck. But If is x truck is better truck all around im not going to buy Y because the interior was better. Had a chevy 1/2 ton, 07 and 08 F250 now an 11 F150 and to be honest dont really know the difference. Chevy's interior was outdated from the start but the seats were comfy as and things were laid out descent the 07 f250 interior was straight out of 1999, 08 wasnt to bad and the new 11 is pretty good.
|
Originally Posted by PhantomChaos
(Post 3671551)
Yes....piece of cake! A five year old can work on these! :drink::drink::drink:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Finally for 2013..some colors from the 150 series..like the Candy Red and Blue Flame Im told that is what customers want..new wheels, interior..which is good by me dont really care for the over rated King Ranch look..THE PLATINUM EDDITION..
|
1 Attachment(s)
Still Running the 2003 7.3 to good of truck to move up.
|
Originally Posted by rssteiny
(Post 3680085)
Still Running the 2003 7.3 to good of truck to move up.
|
Originally Posted by Jassman
(Post 3671492)
I think the comfort of interior, and egernomics and positioning of knobs makes a big difference in fatigue for us guys doing longer hauls. When you drive to Atlanta every other week..it makes a difference. Just picked up a 32 Regulator, delivered it to NC area....long azz haul..then off to WI to bring a 69 Z28 down...43 hours of driving... Comfort makes a difference..especially for us older guys..:drink:
|
Originally Posted by soldier4402
(Post 3670791)
I have a Ford but I think that number one selling comes more from branding and blind followership than actual quality at times. Late 90's early 2000 F150s were junk and that non turbod 7.3 was reliable but weak.
|
Originally Posted by catmando
(Post 3680128)
i hear the turbo goes out at around 200,000. Are you there yet?
|
Originally Posted by Catmando
(Post 3680131)
Are you out of the homebuilding business now or is this hauling just a side job for you?
|
Originally Posted by Jassman
(Post 3673060)
Finally for 2013..some colors from the 150 series..like the Candy Red and Blue Flame Im told that is what customers want..new wheels, interior..which is good by me dont really care for the over rated King Ranch look..THE PLATINUM EDDITION..
Looks great seeing it on a Super Duty! |
Originally Posted by Fordtough150
(Post 3680533)
LOVE the Candy Red Metallic on my '11 F-150.
Looks great seeing it on a Super Duty! |
Originally Posted by Catmando
(Post 3680142)
I thought all the 7.3s were turbo motors?? I had a 1987 F250 6.9 non-turbo IDI it was a dog hauling anything over 5000lbs.
|
09 Ford F350 dually, 6.4 with custom tunes from KEM performance, truck gets 22-23 empty and 16-17 pulling about 14-15K. this is my second one and couldnt be happier with it! i have a buddy with a GM and he hates it and one with a dodge and he loves it, haha. personally i think its personal preference, just like anything else, cars, boats, guns, ect.
|
Originally Posted by spyderconv1999
(Post 3681221)
09 Ford F350 dually, 6.4 with custom tunes from KEM performance, truck gets 22-23 empty and 16-17 pulling about 14-15K. this is my second one and couldnt be happier with it! i have a buddy with a GM and he hates it and one with a dodge and he loves it, haha. personally i think its personal preference, just like anything else, cars, boats, guns, ect.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Jassman
(Post 3680606)
AGREE.. I had a 10 F150 in that color...and Im a Blue guy.. Im actually thinking of getting a dually in that color come Sept/Oct.
|
Originally Posted by soldier4402
(Post 3681234)
Have you ever done the math by hand. Buddy has a 09f450 with spartan and his says the same thing, but actual is a lot less than what that device tells him. From what I heard this is quite common for these devices to say a lot more. Think empty his says 20-22 and really is more like 15-16
Both my Dodge diesels had real-time mpg gauges and they showed between 3-4 mpg more than hand calculated. |
Originally Posted by Catmando
(Post 3681402)
I'm really surprised he got that good with the 4.88 axle on that 450. I would have thought 12-13 hwy unloaded.
Both my Dodge diesels had real-time mpg gauges and they showed between 3-4 mpg more than hand calculated. |
Went to the Vintage Races with a friend this week who owns a Ford F250 6.0. He pulls about 10,000 #s combined enclosed trailer and TransAm race car. He is tired of the expense of owning a diesel and is planning on trading it in on an F150 eco-boost with an 11,300# tow rating.
I would have liked to see the load lowered to 11,300# and seen how the eco-boost compared to the big three with diesel power. (FYI currently have both Ford & Chev in my garage. Have owned Mopar in the past.) |
Originally Posted by Wes Burmark
(Post 3682474)
Went to the Vintage Races with a friend this week who owns a Ford F250 6.0. He pulls about 10,000 #s combined enclosed trailer and TransAm race car. He is tired of the expense of owning a diesel and is planning on trading it in on an F150 eco-boost with an 11,300# tow rating.
I would have liked to see the load lowered to 11,300# and seen how the eco-boost compared to the big three with diesel power. (FYI currently have both Ford & Chev in my garage. Have owned Mopar in the past.) |
My cousin in Alabama and I were talking about this same subject recently and he has just about got me talked into one of these for towing.
[IMG]http://i705.photobucket.com/albums/w...49/M9396x6.jpg[/IMG] http://www.memphisequipment.com/file...M900Series.pdf You know...at the end of the day this 6 x 6 would be a "Champ at the Ramp" and I wouldn't have to concern myself with overloading it.:evilb: |
Originally Posted by soldier4402
(Post 3681419)
yeah is spartan was showing 20+ with no load and 16-17 with a 9500lb boat, we were shocked. Well he went back and hand jammed it and he gets about 16ish now and were guessing around 12-13 towing that boat. But from what I heard a lot of these tuners are full of it as far as their MPG. Either way his F450 got like 8-10mpg all the time dont matter what before Spartan. Thing runs like a raped ape now. Im a beleiver in the system beyond his turbos sound like a freight train and he cant keep boots on them. Damn truck also has a high pitched whine at idle now, that is the things people with tuners dont tell you. Im sure tuners are great specially on older models, problem is newer models are far more complicated to just hack off the DPF and tell the computer to no do a regen.
Friend has one modded too (450), all I know is that with the 4.88 gears truck flies and pulls with ease lol. And at least when stock was always in the 10-11 range whether loaded/unloaded like you mentioned which I always thought was odd lol. |
Originally Posted by Wes Burmark
(Post 3682474)
Went to the Vintage Races with a friend this week who owns a Ford F250 6.0. He pulls about 10,000 #s combined enclosed trailer and TransAm race car. He is tired of the expense of owning a diesel and is planning on trading it in on an F150 eco-boost with an 11,300# tow rating.
I would have liked to see the load lowered to 11,300# and seen how the eco-boost compared to the big three with diesel power. (FYI currently have both Ford & Chev in my garage. Have owned Mopar in the past.) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.